10 weeks of the debate has been completed, a huge round of applause for two greats @fulltimegeek and @wwf <3
Well in my point of view from the extraction of natural resources including natural gas or oil everything benefits this feudal system. Different national and international policies are made just to control the masses and natural resources for the sake of power. They (strategists) has nothing to do with the lives of masses rather they focus how can they please the controlling powers of the world. Under all these circumstances the value of environment protection is too small in their eyes. There is no doubt that nitrogenous matters and excess of toxic gaseous agents are harming the ozone layer as whole. The depletion of ozone layer is ultimately harming the lives of human beings and yes this thing also making all the weathers more intensified.
Fertility of soil has been decreased than past due the misuse of extracted natural reservoirs. As whole such activities not only harmful for the environment but also going to effect the generations to come. So, this is the most severe form of violence because it is harming the masses of the world on macro level.
Are you serious, pipe lines and the ozone layer? There are more direct and immediate cause and effect of pipe lines on things other than the ozone. Can one of those 7 voters please provide your rationale in support of the argument here, because I have a hard time understanding it? Thank you.
Well @magicmage thanks for pointing out the valid point :)
Let me explain this to you, actually pipeline and policy of international politics is not harmful for the ozone depletion rather the misuse of the dug natural resources are definitely causing to deplete the blanket of ozone around the globe. Misuse in the sense of blasts through the leakage of oil pipes.
While I agree with your statement, I don't think you answered the question. Does the government have a valid claim to be able to push the pipeline through? ;) I agree that it benefits them, but do they have the authority to do it?
Well Rob, this is true that i am not that familiar with the political scenario of Canada but i do believe the situation is quite similar all over. So, in this regard i would like to say that the government does not have any right to harm the environment and the public properties.