I wrote you in the tense of the reader. Whomever the reader might be. Would be the you.
That be neither here nor there is real terms.
It does though open the door to interpretation of what we read. If there can be more than one interpretation. Then which one is right. And who then should decide what interpretation is right.
Can an interpretation be both right and wrong at the same time?
Only readers of this blog get rights? Why was the qualifier "as humans" used if you were only referring to readers of this blog?
I referred above to readers of what was wrote. How do you know where else this might appear?
I'm trying to follow along here.
Wouldnt "readers of the blog" naturally be human? Or are you considering bots to be "readers of the blog"? Considering that currently Humans are the only known species that actually "read" a blog with some form of conceiving the text into a thought process and there fore able to conceptualize the subject. Why would anyone question whether there is another species, be it biological or non-biological, outside of being another Human?
Fuck it, I need more coffee. This makes my brain hurt.
That must have been one helluva coffee! lol
Will keep the convo on the other thread if that's alright