This would have been a good review, if it was more objective, less derogatory and less contradictory. @crypto.talk's suggestion to update the images was a good call.
You say;
The app looks really dull and empty.Yet, you added;
The availability of this [chat] function on Partiko makes the app really important.
How can a dull and empty app be important?
You say;
The resteem feature has its importance that can not be overemphasized. Partiko is the only app amongst the three (3) I'm reviewing that allow users resteem articles.
So much for a dull and empty app.
Contradiction:
You say;
I like the concept of sticking with white and blue colors which are somewhat steem's colors but, it's not cool. Maybe I'm asking for too much but it'll be great to see colors on steem android clients.
You like it, yet you want more colours. However, your updated screenshots of Partiko is in contrast with your review.
According to you;
| Esteemapp | Partiko |
|---|---|
| Security | nill |
| Currency | nill |
| Drafts | nill |
My questions after this erroneous assertion, therefore, are;
Did you do this review in a hurry to gain reward?
If no, why are you misinforming users that Partiko have no draft feature and it isn't secured?
Is it because you dislike Partiko for not being an open source project? Or is it because you don't know the app enough to write a review on it?
This post seemed to be focused on nullifying Partiko's strengths, to suit your narrative.
Why is the focus on Partiko and not esteem? Shouldn't the focus be on esteem app, which is an open source project?
Shouldn't the focus be on both, if it is a comparison?
Are "non-open source project" now being reviewed in utopian contributions? I don't think so, and I believe @didic and @tykee would agree with me.
Posted using Partiko Android
I just noticed that about 80% of the images used in this review aren't yours. Would it still be appropriate to call this "your review"?
Could it be the reason why this review is biased?
I appropriately inserted the source of the images that weren't mine.
It is, therefore, safe to say that the information used on this review were gathered from other sources (someone else's opinion taken out of context), and not your user experience.
If no, why was "your experience" not captured in a screenshot taken by you?
I don't see how using a screenshot from my phone or using an image that depicts same thing makes any difference.
I'll also plead with you to stop the accusations. I've written articles about several projects and all have been written based on my user experience. I don't speak about what I have no idea of.
Thanks
It was never my intention to upset you with my observations. My apologies.
No qualms. I deal with criticisms a lot.
@asaj. This post isn't bent on nullifying partiko's strength. The essence of this blog post is to compare Esteemapp with it's competitions. This means reviewing their distinct features and compare them with that of esteemapp. I gave my own review. I understand you if like partiko more than esteemapp and that's fine.
By the way, I don't dislike partiko. It has nothing to do with being open source or not.
For security and drafts. It's different things on esteemapp. Maybe if you read my previous post you will know more about esteemapp's security and drafts function.
Does a difference in draft feature and security layer, render them inexistent?
If you read the summary part of my post, you'll see where I said I'll about their similarities on my next post.
I'm really sorry man, I can't deal with your comments anymore. You love using partiko. That's great.
You choose to deflect, rather than answer the questions. Anyway, good evening my Steem brethren.
Hey @asaj
Here's a tip for your valuable feedback! @Utopian-io loves and incentivises informative comments.
Contributing on Utopian
Learn how to contribute on our website.
Want to chat? Join us on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV.
Vote for Utopian Witness!