We will have to agree to disagree then. Some things are just inheritanly wrong (or they very well should be).
If we use your thinking, then I can justify anything 'oh, I killed him because he stepped on my toe'. It's not objectively bad....
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
To kill a man is bad.
But you definetly must be allowed to say that you gonna kill a man or that you done it already. This info must not be censored. It may save that man!
And with a CP it's totally the same. It's bad to rape childrens (or any human being).
But if it's done somewhere it's good to get a world know that it's been done. So CP must be spreaded maximally if you really whant to save kids. Only reason to censor CP is if you a molester!
Remember pizzagate? Child rapists are in our government. And they give us this censorship.
It may be good to control physical aggression by force, but it's NEWER good to censor information by force. Or you will be brainwashed by touse who do it to think that CP, piracy or woman with a bare heads, or gays, or anything else are "objectively bad".
It's good to get the word out that it's done? So more people follow the example? You know the media pushes these things right? When one psychopath sees that another person has shot a bunch of people, they can (not always, but sometimes) feel inspired to follow along. Because obviously some people 'agree' with them.
The uncensored internet (darknet) has whole rings of pedophiles who share this content. Have you ever used the darknet? You'd love it, it's totally uncensored. When this shit is shown, it creates more, hell, it even creates a market for it. Spreading it does not make it better or make more people aware, it creates a bigger problem.
It IS GOOD to censor some things. I can't believe how narrow-minded you are. I'm done with this argument.