Yes, I think I have read all the posts related to Steemit statistics.
In my analysis I present another point of view to show that the use of the Gregorian calendar distorts the results and that a more adequate calendar is possible. That is, my contribution places more emphasis on the method used than on the data. Sometimes we can't see the forest for the trees.
It is a more transcendental issue than it may seem at first glance, although fortunately the results have to be coherent with the previous analyzes.
Hey @crokkon, I just gave you a tip for your hard work on moderation. Upvote this comment to support the utopian moderators and increase your future rewards!
Yes, I think I have read all the posts related to Steemit statistics.
In my analysis I present another point of view to show that the use of the Gregorian calendar distorts the results and that a more adequate calendar is possible. That is, my contribution places more emphasis on the method used than on the data. Sometimes we can't see the forest for the trees.
It is a more transcendental issue than it may seem at first glance, although fortunately the results have to be coherent with the previous analyzes.
thank you.
Hey @crokkon, I just gave you a tip for your hard work on moderation. Upvote this comment to support the utopian moderators and increase your future rewards!
Aaawww @crokkon, you honor me more than I deserve. Thanks!