I am glad to see a new update on SteemQA so soon after the first one. It is clear that you are putting in the work to make it better, and to report about it here.
I found this post more detailed and explanatory than the previous one, though even more details would not be amiss. It is basically impossible to tell people too much about your project. More information is good.
The post still had some proofreading issues, which I would recommend keeping a look out for in future posts.
I did have one question that I should have asked in the comment to the previous post: Why SteemQA? Why not SteemQandA? Too long? When I think of QA, I think of Quality Assurance. My first thought when seeing the previous thought was "is this like Utopian for QA?" To me, Q&A represents questions and answers, not QA. That may be my issue, and it may be too late to make the change. But I wanted to ask.
I'm looking forward to the next update!
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Hi @didic,
Thank you for another insightful comment.
I never thought about the Quality Assurance acronym but now that you mention it I can see why it would come to somebody's mind with the name SteemQA.
Truth is that I have a very bad imagination when it comes to project names! :-)
I can't think of a better name for now but I'll ponder on this for the next few days.
What's probably more important is the name that I will give to the application running making use of this platform.
I will probably have to think about something better than StemQA for the STEM Q&A application. :-)
Thanks again!
Thank you for your review, @didic!
So far this week you've reviewed 6 contributions. Keep up the good work!