This post was something of a mixed bag for me. While the content was interesting, for the most part, the presentation made it hard to read. From issues of proofreading and grammar to issues of formatting, this post was challenging before we even get to the content.
Another issue is that there is very little editorial content on offer. You mention your contact with the project folks, and you have a screenshot, but apart from saying it was positive, you add nothing. When promoting a project that is not your own, one wants to read your experiences. That's what makes it unique and worthwhile, instead of being a cause to just google the project.
I'm sorry if this comes off as harsh, and I hope it motivates you to create better content in the future.
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Thank you for your review, @didic!
So far this week you've reviewed 14 contributions. Keep up the good work!
I would want to improve on my next post please tell me were exactly did I miss the styling in the post, so next time I may improve on that, along with the write up and grammarHello @didic I will like to ask do you or utopian use Steem app or browser site Site to read utopian post? Don't be angry about the question please I noticed that some tags used on the steemit app like esteem may show as a writing it may show (<then the tag ) instead of actually formatting the word or text it self. When the post is viewed on browser
I find your comment to be uninteresting and ill-informed and you made a typo ( on : to ) It did little else other than to point out it was low-quality content. Could you please personalize your comment with experience relating to this post. #heclgang #utopian-hecl