You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Earning potential analysis for curator/author on all audio/video dapps on the Steem blockchain

in #utopian-io • 6 years ago

Ah, my mistake! That is a good catch! So that means the beneficiary data is inflated and should be scaled by an additional .75 factor, and the scaling used to estimate the author for both dtube and dsound will need slight adjustments (as you say, with the early votes this estimate will be further off depending on what happened on the post).

I'll go ahead and do that now and let @silentscreamer know.

6 years ago in #utopian-io by
$0.00
    Reply 1
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     6 years ago  

    @silentscreamer

    It doesn't change the conclusions thankfully, but here are the specific adjustments to the data:

    Dtube

    • Curator curation from from beneficiary goes from 2.132 to 1.6, total curation from 6.999 to 6.466, ROI from 86% to 75%, and annual estimates from 25547 to 23601.87.
    • Author portion goes from 17.95 to 20.19
    • Top 15% numbers, total goes from 13604 to 15304.74, average goes from 223 to 250.90 and annual average goes from 2713 to 3052.59.

    Dsound

    • Author portion goes from 6.58 to 7.40
    • Top 15% numbers, total goes from 5682 to 6392.47, average goes from 167 to 188.01 and annual average goes from 2033 to 2287.50.
    $0.00
      Reply