I think ganging up to increase rewards shows a lack of class.
Picking winners disadvantages all not chosen.
Which is the game we are playing until we start scheming to keep some down for personal reasons.
If they voted 'good' content i would care less, but they vote based on criteria other than a 'good' post.
And yes, we are well aware that reputation, and adulation, dont follow 'good' content, either.
Have you crunched any numbers?
Does it pay for newbs to play their game?
Yeah, damn it. You and your red pills! Lol
Yeah I just saw the post yesterday and would be nice to run a deep analysis. I'm not really sure about the numbers at this time.
It was nice to see that I have a better UA than a few of those vote buying Trenders. I'm just sick of bid bot people having the leg up on me and seeing their smug little faces. Kind of seen this as an equalizer of sorts.
I'm going to need to give this some careful thought. :/
Posted using Partiko Android
I mean, if we have to put up with spoiled rich kids, and their sycophants, in real life, who would join steem just to get more of the same?
As long as the inflation goes to the haves, as it does under linear rewards, why would havenots stick around to watch it?
Let alone invest to watch their money line somebody else's pocket.
Stinc intentionally hobbled us.
At some point a fork us inevitable, if we want steem to thrive.