This is a task request for stbot. Read here https://github.com/codename-littleboy/steemit-moderation about what it does.
I wish to expand its functions and show more stats about posts. I already have showing views in my mind. Currently the bot shows the following stats:
I want to add more stats about steemit posts to it so that the community members can get an idea of how much value a specific post is bringing to steem and how should they vote on it.
So, in summary, the task request is about providing insights about what functions to add so that the bot can show more statistics and help with determining the value of a post.
Please consider posting your submissions in the comments and I will consider giving high votes on them. If you post ideas via utopian, please read the rules at utopian.io/rules to make sure they comply with utopian standards.
Posted on Utopian.io - Rewarding Open Source Contributors
Total Payout: $29.91($1.39 from bots) - Votes: 72 - Comments: 5 - Rank: 207 - Reward Pool Allocation: 0.017% - Age: 3 days
An addition such as this could be added to display the current rank of the post(based on the potential payouts of all active posts at any given moment) and what percentage of the reward pool has currently been allocated to the post.
I'm not sure if that is possible but it is something I would like to see on such a bot.
Also, I think as you add more stats it can get overwhelming, so if you simplified it and showed only how much has been earned from bots, then the reader can figure out what was voted organically by omission. This should free up some space for more statistics.
Hey littleboy. As i personaly like to know alot of the things gouing on in my posts i believe this a great addition. What i would love as a extra:
I hope some of these can be included.
I think it makes sense to include "Topic" (first tag) and "Interface" (via steemit.com/busy.org/chainbb.com) to the bot.
The reviewers of Curie check if the author has already recieved >$25 post reward during the last week or not. This is to be fair, as their upvote usually shoots posts to >$150 range.
It might be useful to implement something like that to check whether the author has had a very successful post already recently so that someone else could get a boost.
Those are some damn good ideas you got there.
that,s good. there could an addition it is showing the number of votes a person get. you can include the top 10 votes with the value or amount who gave you the vote and how much it worth . and also number of resteems with there names who has resteem the post.
Views could be in there.
Number of Resteems
I think it might be useful to develop some kind of "quality score" for a given post.
One of the problems is that, even if you can distinguish between users and bots, there will always be users who try simple tricks to superficially boost their own posts, whether it's through upvote/resteem exchanges or the classic follow/unfollow tactic or some other trick. If people are incentivized to upvote a certain number of posts through an exchange, for example (e.g. steemfollower.com), they will likely gravitate towards more superficial content (like photos or memes) so that they can reach their required quota of upvotes as quickly as possible. "Deeper" content, which requires more time/thought to create and also more time/thought to digest tends to lose out to memes and the like for this reason. And so the time/effort involved in creating "deep" content likely isn't rewarded in a way that reflects that time/effort.
One idea for assessing quality would involve assessing the "depth" of a post. This might be achieved with some data-mining/ML/AI techniques to to assess the post relative to other posts that have already been given some kind of quality score manually. Ideally, this would also test for plagiarism, since originality should ideally be valued over content duplication. If this kind of functionality were to be developed, this might also provide an interesting content discovery idea for Steem: let users find content that is of similar "depth" to their own.
Another idea would be to take an approach similar to PageRank, where the quality of a post is calculated by some combination of the following:
The two ideas could be combined, in that the "depth" of a given comment could also be taken into account in assessing its quality. Perhaps the Steem platform itself could eventually track things like the number of keystrokes or the active time spent in the editor so that quality can be eventually be assessed more robustly. Of course, I'm sure the spammers out there will figure out new ways to exploit the system, but at least they'll have to try harder.
Approved.
You can contact us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]
Number of votes in the last 24 hours and total resteems would both be awesome. Average vote weight would also be nice for telling how much people appreciate the post.
Hey @littleboy I am @utopian-io. I have just upvoted you!
Achievements
Community-Driven Witness!
I am the first and only Steem Community-Driven Witness. Participate on Discord. Lets GROW TOGETHER!
Up-vote this comment to grow my power and help Open Source contributions like this one. Want to chat? Join me on Discord https://discord.gg/Pc8HG9x
I would go with son-of-satire:
Because i think the percentage is interesting, but i would add the steemit Reputation and maybe the Blog-Post Number, if it's possible to count.
Total Payout: $29.91($1.39 from bots) - Votes: 72 (Flags -2) - Comments: 5 - Rank: 207 - Blog-Post-Nr: 77 - AuthorReputation(79) - Reward Pool Allocation: 0.017% - Age: 3 days
Maybe the Flags counter could be added, too. If it's possible you could also add the number of times the post is promoted.
Just some thoughts
An addition would be Identifying the top voters so you could repay their goodness to you. Also the time of the upvoters since those who voted first are most likely the ones who really liked your posts.