Yeah, but wouldn´t that be unfair? If your post gets to the upvote bot later (because sometimes it´s just pretty full) then you get less - even though your post may be worth more in general...
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yeah, but wouldn´t that be unfair? If your post gets to the upvote bot later (because sometimes it´s just pretty full) then you get less - even though your post may be worth more in general...
Less unfair than not getting a vote at all because your post expires. I don't see any other solution than having an adaptive voting threshold. But perhaps there is a more elegant implementation.
Also it's not necessarily a bad thing to encourage posts when the usage is low, to help create a consistent reviewer load.
Well.. that is true. The problem is, commits have to be 14 days old max, so sometimes you cannot wait for a less full queue. But I am sure they will come up with something good if needed :)