Ah. Another self upvoter. Always hidden in the comments.
Did you get why your top guy has such high curation figures? It's something I've been aware of for a while but never seen it have such an impact before.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The maths i don't dare try and compute!
https://steemit.com/@auliausu/curation-rewards
5 days ago 1.446 STEEM POWER for iqbalhood/building-your-first-multiplatform-apps-using-ionic
https://steemit.com/utopian-io/@iqbalhood/building-your-first-multiplatform-apps-using-ionic
3rd man in with $0.01/2 of 25, @utopian-io finally decided on what they wanted to vote with, 10%, 2 days later.
1.446 SP for a 100% vote worth 1.0-1.5 cents, lovely!
Utopian get no curation rewards on their $27 upvote because they changed their vote. I'm not sure this is widely known. So their $6+ curation rewards get spread between everyone else. And there are only $0.27 of other upvotes! So the first two guys get $2.70 and $1.30 curation off 1c upvotes!
I'm going to post something on Utopian. Probably in the bug section. It's not clear from the messages.
So you get nothing for the 2nd vote curation-wise?
I knew you didn't redeem anything from cancelling a first vote, but i didn't know the 2nd was worthless to the voter?!
That could be why there is a 1444.6%? return though!
That's what I think.
I've seen it happen before but I've always assumed that it's just not being picked up correctly somehow on steemit or in steemsql rather than on the blockchain. It's hard to prove with small examples among hundreds of votes.
But the first guy in your table gets a huge curation reward from a 1c upvote and that's just not possible unless utopian gets nothing.