You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Vaccination is based on a false premise

in #vaccination4 years ago

     
It looks like this post contains a link that does not use a secure protocol: http://www.whale.to/a/mcbean.html.
HTTP is in use instead of HTTPS and no protocol redirection is in place.
Be careful and do not enter sensitive information in that website as your data won't be encrypted.
It's also a good habit to always hover links before clicking them in order to see the actual link in the bottom-left corner of your browser.


More info on this service here. For more information on HTTP unsafety read: https://whynohttps.com   https://web.dev/why-https-matters.

{average of post/comments with HTTP links I found per hour: 19.7}.

This auto-reply is throttled 1/20 to reduce spam but if it still bothers you reply "OFF HTTP". Or reply REVIEW for manual review and whitelisting.
Sort:  

Is there is a vaccine for needing to endlessly go on about HTTP links?

How to drive Hive users off the platform by harassing them about bullshit...

Get over it, who cares?

image.png

Yep. OFF = vaccinate me.

Whitelisted.

Thanks, but why on earth do you do this? - most of the best content on the internet is on HTTP websites, including all my own (over 3000 pages), simply because the content being posted over 10 years ago was so much better - it will never be changed to HTTPS - is this going to be used as another way to try to censor content?

Google are leading the charge and google are as deep state as it gets, so YES!

image.png

This is not about security anymore than vaccinations are about viruses - this is NEW WORLD ORDER...

It's an authority complex in some cases and in others they need to point at something and say... Look I did a thing.

I'm not sure which is scarier - google or people who want to be remembered for freaking out about HTTP sites - WTF?

This seems like it could be a post in itself. Firefox used to actively block me from sites. Don't remember what I did to get them to stop, but I still get warnings. Being ignorant as I am on it I've been wary of sites due to all the warnings. I still venture onto them as I don't plan on logging in or anything, but still not certain of the exact risks that make them so adamant they should be avoided at all costs.

Risks to their wall of censorship!