ignorant would imply that she hasn't read all of the studies. Caco is one of the most well read people on the subject I've come across in years. It isn't so much of a position of ignorance. It's one of exceptional knowledge. She's done the research on both sides of this argument for years and walked away thinking that vaccines cause harm.
It's hard to come to that conclusion, and people that have spent years researching this and voice that opinion come to folks like you. I'm sure you've read all the studies published by the pharma docs. I've read them too. When you read them you have to come to one conclusion and that is that vaccines save lives. It's not until you read additional evidence and testimonials that question that narrative that you realize the data is fraud, the professionals are taught and bribed to look the other way and mock people that question their pharma studies, and we're purposely made to look like quacks.
That's not what honest scientific dialog looks like. Come back and show me double blind studies of how these vaccines cause no harm. Find me studies that show how 64 shots by the time you're 12 causes no harm. You won't find them. And lastly the real evidence is in the scoreboard. 1:52 kids has autism and something like a 1/3 of all kids will have a variety of developmental disorders, but only in heavily vaccinated communities. It's not rocket science. It's tobacco science, but until you pierce the veil that they're liars you're going to keep being rude, ignoring the millions of people that have been harmed, and relying on bullshit science to propel a line of thinking that will continue to cause harm.
Have you seen Vaxxed? or did you just dismiss it entirely?
"Come back and show me double blind studies of how these vaccines cause no harm. Find me studies that show how 64 shots by the time you're 12 causes no harm."
Normally if you accusse something/somebody YOU are the one who should bring up a study which actually draws a conclusion between vacciness and things like autism. Guess what - there is one. Wakefield. A man who git his study withdrawn and lost his license since his study was soo poor made. Did you read his study. Not just the conclusion. The study. How he did it. What he did wrong. How little evidence he had. Did you?
Vaxxed is about personal destinies. In some cases extreme harsh destinies. But its not science. Its stories. Some unproven. Some might be true and really connected to vaccines.
Do you really think all doctors are bribed by pharma?
I've seen the bluecross payment schedules that show docs have to keep a certain percentage of their clients fully vaxxed at which point they get hundreds of thousands or they dont' have enough and lose all of it.
Wakefield isn't the only one that links gut bacteria and health to functional brain development.
I can't link the studies that don't exist. Best bets are the ones where they compare autism rates of different countries and find that scandinavian countries with 10ish vaccines have rates of 1 in 10k where as heavily vaxxed populations have 1 in 50.