Did any of you read the following post? It basically just says that the article contains lots of manipulations/fabrications.. And even if that wasn't the case (but it is, I'm a cat and I'm better at using Photoshop that those "doctors" are 😹) there are not enough proves of the correlation between aluminum and autism.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I saw this and am concerned as well. If those truly are "photoshopped" I am just wondering if this was a comparison portion of the study. I don't understand the purpose/intent of that section of the study. If it truly is fallacious I am glad to denounce it and still maintain that more research is warranted regarding vaccine safety based on hundreds of studies, reports, and documented side effects. This isn't about "anti-vax" vs. "vax" but about being scientific. I find the laughing face with the tears emoji to be indicative of this type of puerile attitude, but sadly that is what the "conversation" has become in so many ways.
Maybe you are right, we shouldn't laugh about this kind of arguments.. i was just trying to downplay it a bit.. I'm totally with you about being scientific on this.. in Italy we say "laugh to keep from crying" to express the discomfort about a topic that is important and still so badly dealt with that you feel like crying.. so you try to minimize by laughing.
Anyway, I'm sure the research keeps goin on with this topic.. the meaning of my sentence was that I'm sad that there are doctors the spread wrong informations that incentivate people to not use vaccines that helps in so many way and are therefore important