You just argued that vaccinations help people that cannot be vaccinated, regardless that these people shed the disease after vaccination for a long time in some cases, and that vaccination has never been implemented in such a way as to be considered efficient since the population is hardly vaccinated in such rates and the vaccines immunity is diminished in a couple years, with it being entirely compromised after 3-4 years.
You've asked me repeatedly what education level I had, and attacked my character and others, and haven't bothered to back up any of your claims, the last exchange we had is there for everyone interested. The level of insensitivity and cruelty you displayed, the denial of the implications of the study I provided, the numerous times you were offered chances to back up your claims and instead passed on that, reassuring us that your claims are backed up by such and such, but never providing one specific as to why and how are all there in the last conversation on this subject between us. The strawman of "can you determine from the statement itself if it's a fact or an opinion" is the same evasive maneuver you attempted in the past, come again, when you want to discuss the subject, when you can be bothered to cite your claims.