Actually I'm just testing you to see if he was reading comments. No point in wasting time arguing with someone who will hit and run.
And my point about aluminium in cans and di-hydrogen-monoxide are serious ones. There are toxic levels of exposure of everything - yes aluminium but also water. And I'm not tallking about drowning - people can and do die from drinking too much water. I'm sure you know that.
Which means it is vital to look at exposure levels and consider statistics - so you can't just cherry pick data that supports your case either.
Why is it that someone would cite and apparently believe hook line and sinker the output of Humphries and Mercola, and yet omit the conclusions of the FDA report linked to, instead just citing a paragraph about toxicity pathways of aluminum out of context?
For the record here is what the FDA link provided says:
Vaccines containing an aluminum adjuvant have a demonstrated safety profile of over six decades of use and have only uncommonly been associated with severe local reactions.
The FDA study found that the maximum amount of aluminum an infant could be exposed to over the first year of life would be 4.225 milligrams (mg), based on the recommended schedule of vaccines. Federal Regulations for biological products (including vaccines) limit the amount of aluminum in the recommended individual dose of biological products, including vaccines, to not more than 0.85-1.25 mg. For example, the amount of aluminum in the hepatitis B vaccine given at birth is 0.25 mg.
Aluminum is found naturally in large quantities in the environment, often consumed through drinking water or ingesting certain foods, such as infant formula. Using the updated parameters, the authors found that the body burden of aluminum from vaccines and diet throughout an infant’s first year of life is significantly less than the corresponding safe body burden of aluminum, based on the minimal risk levels established by the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.
Furthermore, many infants might not receive the entire series of recommended vaccines or the particular combination of vaccines that delivers the maximum amount of aluminum. Therefore, it is likely that some infants will have even lower aluminum levels than calculated in this study and will be at even lower risk for exposure to aluminum through vaccination.
However, it's your bodies, do what you want with it. From the sound of it most commenters here will find the homeopathic "remedies" peddled by Humphries and Mercola's far more agreeable. They are after all just pure but highly profitable di-hydrogen-monoxide placebos. Well lets hope they are actually pure and don't contain any aluminum or any of the toxins that the homeopaths say they contain "memories" of.
Finally:
Could there be a more sinister reason that aluminum is put in vaccines?
Why does anyone feel the need to drop a completely speculative and unsubstantiated comment like this at the end of a post of they are expecting to be taken seriously? Is it just bait to attract conspiracy theory troll upvotes? When you dump a turd like that at the end of what might otherwise have been an honest attempt at pseudo research you are begging to be bucketed with the pizzagate and flat-earth crowd.