These graphs visually illustrate that vaccines can worsen health outcomes and are not proven, foolproof protection from infectious disease. Vaccines are often inconsequential epidemiologically!
This is irrefutable evidence that vaccinated individuals can be more susceptible to infectious disease than an unvaccinated person.
Water, sanitation and food are responsible for disease decline - not vaccines!
These graphs cover seven (7) different infectious diseases!
* Influenza
* Chicken Pox
* Mumps
* Measles
* Diphtheria
* Tuberculosis
* Whooping Cough
This not a random or isolated result - it is seven (7) different viruses where vaccines are proven to be ineffective and in some cases make you more likely to be infected.
I will write a few words at the top of some graphs.
Inactivated Vaccine = Not a Live Virus
Children under 2
Result = 0% Effective
Source: Cochrane Collaboration Database of Systematic Reviews, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.) 2006 (1) Article No. CD004879 – Covers 51 Studies on 260,000 children
Elderly = Little or No Effect
Source: Cochrane Collaboration Database of Systematic Reviews, (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.) 2006 (3) Article No. CD004876 – Covers 64 Studies, over 40 years of infuenza vaccination & BMJ
Tuberculosis Instances Higher among Double Dose Vaccinated
More Vaccine = More Tuberculosis
Source: Randomised controlled trial of single BCG, repeated BCG, or combined BCG and killed Mycobacterium leprae vaccine for prevention of leprosy and tuberculosis in Malawi; The Lancet, Volume 348, Issue 9019, Pages 17 - 24, 6 July 1996
250,000 Babies (0 - 2.5 years)
Twice as Likely to Catch Tuberculosis when Vaccinated vs Placebo Group
Source: Double blind randomized controlled trial of BCG’s effectiveness on 250,000 subjects Tuberculosis Research Centre (ICMR), Chennai, India: Indian Journal of Medical Research, 110, August 1999, pp. 56-69.
Diphtheria Instances Rise AFTER Introduction of Vaccine
Source: E. Ekanem; A 10-Year Review of Morbidity from Childhood Preventable Diseases in Nigeria: How Successful is the Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI)?; Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Vol. 34; No. 6; UK; 1988; pp. 323-328
Whooping Cough Instances Rise AFTER Introduction of Vaccine
Source: E. Ekanem; A 10-Year Review of Morbidity from Childhood Preventable Diseases in Nigeria: How Successful is the Expanded Programme of Immunization (EPI)?; Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Vol. 34; No. 6; UK; 1988; pp. 323-328
Ineffective on Measles AFTER Introduction of Vaccine
Sources: Data for years 1978-1987 Taken from UNICEF Evaluation Publication No. 6, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, May 27, 1988; and Data for years 1988-1989 from personal communication from PAHO, EPI Unit, Aug. 21, 1990
Diphtheria Instances Rise AFTER Introduction of Vaccine
Source: Data for years 1978-1987 Taken from UNICEF Evaluation Publication No. 6, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, May 27, 1988
Whooping Cough Instances Rise AFTER Introduction of Vaccine
Sources: Data for years 1978-1987 Taken from UNICEF Evaluation Publication No. 6, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, May 27, 1988; and Data for years 1988-1989 from personal communication from PAHO, EPI Unit, Aug. 21, 1990
The last five (5) graphs represent studies in Nigeria (3rd world nation) and Dominican Republic (2nd world nation, developing). In 4 of the 5 graphs the instances of the disease rose AFTER the introduction of the vaccine. In the 5th graph (figure 22) the vaccine had little to no effect as it rose back to pre-vaccination levels. 2nd and 3rd world nations are more likely to have much less access to fresh water, sanitation and quality foods than people living in 1st world nations. I have not investigated to see if there is a direct correlation but I would not be surprised if there was.
Influenza vaccines generally show high efficacy, as measured by the antibody production in animal models or vaccinated people. However, studies on the effectiveness of flu vaccines in the real world are difficult; vaccines may be imperfectly matched, virus prevalence varies widely between years, and influenza is often confused with other influenza-like illnesses. However, in most years (16 of the 19 years before 2007), the flu vaccine strains have been a good match for the circulating strains, and even a mismatched vaccine can often provide cross-protection.
Trials of both live and inactivated influenza vaccines against seasonal influenza have been summarized in several 2012 meta-analyses. Studies on live vaccines have very limited data, but these preparations may be more effective than inactivated vaccines. The meta-analyses examined the efficacy and effectiveness of inactivated vaccines against seasonal influenza in adults, children, and the elderly. Source: Wikipedia - Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness
Please allow me to dissect two points from the Wikipedia quote.
Influenza vaccines generally show high efficacy, as measured by the antibody production in animal models or vaccinated people.
Big Pharma, Governments and people that allow themselves to be vaccinated deem a vaccine to be effective when they an increase in antibody production. I suspect that very few of the vaccinated are aware that this is how vaccine efficacy is determined. Other metrics are used but an increase in antibody production is used in the vast, vast majority of tests.
Oh, I almost forgot. Of course you will see an increase in antibodies - my body is simply reacting to the foreign object and toxin that you jacked into me, prick.
Studies on live vaccines have very limited data, but these preparations may be more effective than inactivated vaccines.
They have limited data - is that what the doctors, scientists, politicians and media tell you?
Also note, they are comparing one vaccine (live) against another vaccine (inactivated) when they should be comparing both of them against a double-blind placebo group. Big Pharma knows this and so do you, it’s plain common sense! Big Pharma does not want to conduct double-blind placebo studies and Big Pharma gets what Big Pharma wants!
Vaccine studies in almost all instances are rigged so as to achieve pre-desired outcomes!
The medical profession is being bought by the pharmaceutical industry, not only in terms of the practice of medicine, but also in terms of teaching and research. The academic institutions of this country are allowing themselves to be the paid agents of the pharmaceutical industry. I think it’s disgraceful. – Arnold Seymour Relman (1923-2014), Harvard Professor of Medicine and Former Editor-in-Chief of the New England Medical Journal
Conclusion
The test results above prove that vaccines are not effective against disease, and even worse, in some cases vaccines significantly increase the likelihood of catching a disease. Vaccines are not necessary for the effective elimination of a wide range of infectious diseases!
Water, Sanitation and Food are Necessary!
Big Pharma makes a lot money peddling vaccines - as do politicians - campaign donations are not free gifts, there is an expectation of a return for the leg-up that was accepted. Big Pharma (and the bankers) bought the US Government over a century ago and they are in collusion to this very day - that’s a fact and if you don’t see that today I hope that one day you will - because it is true!
Google “Vaccine Injuries” and “Vaccine Compensation” - get informed and please get active if this topic is important to you, even if only occasionally!
I have intentionally kept these last two posts very simple in the hope that it easy to understand and that you will share the information with others. The topic of vaccinations is not as complicated as some would like you to think it is. The graph results do not lie, you can see it with your own eyes and so can others.
Please spread the word and thanks for reading this post.
Till next time..
Yours in Health & Truth
@Steemtruth
Thank you to Dr Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. for preparing this study.
Related Posts
VACCINE AWARENESS - Powerful Interview With VAXXED Producer Polly Tommey!
Boy With 46 DD BREASTS that Sued Johnson & Johnson & WON!
CONFESSIONS of a BIG PHARMA (Rx) DRUG PUSHER - Gwen Olsen's Story!
America's Health has been BOUGHT - the Ugly Truth Behind GMO's, Vaccines and Big Pharma!
Like I said in the last post, you can't argue with the numbers.
The relationship between big business and governments has turned towards the fascist model over the past few decades and Big Pharma has used that opportunity to the max. The amount of unnecessary vaccinations is clearly testament to that fact.
Sadly though I fear too many people are completely bought into the system that they'll never question it.
I've laid down the facts regarding the flu vaccination to my parents more times than I care to remember and they still go off and get the flu jab every year! They trust the doctors, end of story.
Another great post @steemtruth
I've had the same problem - the brainwashing is deep and old habits aren't easy to change, especially when we are older and even more so when they don't believe you. Thankfully we are already awake. Good on ya @tremendospercy
good one mate
I was waiting your post and here you are.. Yesterday I red your blog about the same vaccination and totall I agree with you I cant belive that human life is so cheap and also financilally powerful at the same time for companies. I even wonder for other medical care systems and drugs are they weather favourable or not.
Through the biotechonologic age science try to find solution with gen therapy for every diseases so after some time thanks to university and some acedemical cooperations everything will be open sourced.
Graet post thank you I hope many people will read this..
The people that knowingly allow these things to happen are psychopaths, literally!
Exactly and believe me the world is going like that unfortunately in every sector not just medical. For example I was working for a medical company and what I saw is doctors were caring with patients like they are broken cars and waiting to be repaired but this is not doctors fault. It is becasue of system.
Doctors are also not healthy psycholigcally. Fully automation medical care is necessary I mean like robotic surgery and for some common and simple diseases like flu, machines or artificial intelligence should be used.
yesteday's post was seriously flawed, as he showed mortality and not new infections against the years. Mortality has gone down even as new infections haven't due to an improvement of medical standards in the 50s-60s. Infections have radically dropped after the start of the vaccination programs.
Injecting diseases prevents diseases ?
Cause and effect big difference
That's like thinking you can inject pimple pus (poison) to prevent pimples .
Toxoids prevents toxins ?
Cow pus eradicated small pox ?
Everyday millions of children are lined up and injected with toxic putrid substances grown on animal organs, cancer cells, aborted fetuses and other toxic substances. Few people are questioning how those viruses were obtained and how they were grown in a laboratory. If one would ask these sensible questions, one would become very enlightened about vaccine production.
I respect your opinion, but it is still wrong. The "training" of the immune system with weakened microbes/viruses DOES has an immunizing effect, which is well established by countless clinical studies all around the globe.
Th1 Th2 Th3
We have no scientific studies in infants, children or adults to help us understand the nature of the progression of TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune responses to any of the injected materials in vaccines.
Children are born with a cellular mediated immune system (TH1 cells – T-helper 1), a humoral immune system (TH2 cells – T-helper 2), and a regulator immune system (TH3 cells – T-helper 3) as major pieces of their overall immune systems. These three arms are immature when babies are born, and begin to mature as children are exposed to their environments through their nervous systems, skin, airways and intestines. Antibiotics, poor nutrition, stress, exposure to heavy metals and other environmental toxins, and the use of vaccines, may interfere with the proper maturing process of these three arms of children’s immune systems. In theory, if the TH system is allowed to mature, and is not interfered with, children will develop a mature, balanced TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune system by age three.
TH1 and TH2 develop to protect children from the outside world, producing inflammation and anti-inflammation responses to foreign particles from the natural environment. TH3 immune cells develop to keep the TH1/TH2 arms of the immune system in check so the body only produces the amount of inflammation and anti-inflammation that is needed to protect itself from exposures in the natural environment.
When TH2 cells are activated properly, either directly via the natural environment, or through a direct signal from the TH1 system, the B cell arm of the immune system is then stimulated, leading to the production of the desired protective antibodies.
It’s important for the reader to know that the hallmark of a healthy, mature immune system in children is demonstrated by an equal and balanced TH1, TH2 and TH3 immune response to the natural environment. TH1, TH2 & TH3 do not work independently, and require a very important synergistic relationship to function properly in our bodies. As soon as one or more of these three arms begins to over or under work in relation to the other, chronic illness begins to express itself.
Aluminum is placed in the vaccines to selectively target the up-regulation of the humoral arm (TH2 cells) of children’s immune systems, to drive the production of antibodies. The medical community leads us to "believe" that this production of antibodies is what imparts for children a protective nature against vaccine-preventable illnesses. Yet, this outcome may come at a cost.
More on this
http://www.nvic.org/Doctors-Corner/Aluminum-and-Vaccine-Ingredients.aspx#ret3
I Have hundreds of studies and doctors that think otherwise ;)
University of Chicago researchers found that Memory T cells are “distressingly slow learners”, requiring “several generations” of intensive stimulation to make a lasting impression on T cells “No vaccine trial to date has been able to produce significant numbers of memory T lymphocytes...”
The Pasteur Institute found that “98% of the immune responses triggered at the early stages of infection are non specific. These non specific responses had been observed following different infections by viruses, bacteria, parasites and fungi.” This means that natural immune system affords 98% of the early response to an infectious disease agent, while the adaptive or memory-based protective response that vaccination seeks to stimulate represents only 2% of early response.
Our immune system doesn't need a reminder ;)
Children with agammaglobulinaemia have no capacity to produce antibodies after contracting zymotic diseases, but still recover from measles with long-lasting immunity.
Explain how antibodies determine immunity.
"Effective" means that a vaccine is injected (vaccination) into the patient, and the patient develops an antibody. Vaccination does not mean that the patients develops an immunity.
Scientists prove that the antibodies from vaccinations
ARE NOT NEEDED.
To prove this, scientists from HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL, M.I.T., massachusetts general, san raffaele institute (Italy), and other institutes, co-authored and published on how they removed all antibodies from mice, leaving only B-Cells, which successfully fought off lethal viruses. This debunks vaccine manufacturers who say that vaccines are necessary to convey immunity. This
suggests that repeated vaccinations could be the reason why some vaccinated people lose their natural immunities, as their body tends to unnaturally rely on temporary, antibody-based immunities.
Immunity 2012 Mar 23; 36(3): 415-426:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3359130/pdf/nihms-377739.pdf
The study, entitled “B cell maintenance of subcapsular sinus macrophages protects against a fatal viral infection independent of adaptive immunity,” examined mice that had been infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). The results of the experiment were quite surprising to the scientists. As Dr. Ulrich H. von Andrian of Harvard Medical School stated, “Mice infected with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) can suffer fatal invasion of the central nervous system even when they have a high concentration of anti-VSV antibodies in their system. This observation led us to revisit the contribution of adaptive immune responses to survival following VSV infection.”
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/22386268/
First off, I really appreciate that you try to argument at the scientific level - this seperates you from most anti-vaxxers I ran into so far.
It would take me far too long to answer to all of these arguments in a comment, so I will most likely dedicate a post to it - but as quality takes time, this might take a few days. Is it ok if I mention you in this post?
One last thing: if you really believe antibodies are responsible for gaining immunity, I think you don't really grasp how our immune system works. To deny "training effects" and memory of immunic responses is to deny the existience of the adaptive immune system itself.
I totally agree with this post
I have some writings that I have published, but I have not published a lot
I am very pleased to read the text I wrote about colds and treatments two weeks ago
The treatment should be herbal to prevent damage to the body
https://steemit.com/life/@marketclob/the-best-way-to-treat-severe-colds
i am medical.student....this post is more importent for us...thanks for sharing
Good post thank you. I already decided not to vaccinate my kids. Especially when it's mandatory. Still most of the doctors give advice to do it and tell you that all the news on the net is fake. In the meanwhile there are hundreds of documents on the net proving that it does more harm than good. Also there is a film called Vaxxed that had a lot of commotion about beeing freely published. In the film they link autism to vaccinations that had me thinking. Like it falls in place like a piece of a puzzle. The rich who monopolized most of the wealth have an agenda to depopulate the earth by using different tactics one of which is the alluminum baced vacccinations. It seems that they are failing now becouse they can't control the free flow information anymore.
Yess thank you. I really understand a lot of people don't 'believe' these kind of graphs and a lot of people think it's a one in a million chance of getting ill by vaccines, rather than being cured. It's because for so long we've been told these lies about herd immunity and irradication of diseases since they started the vaccinations. People don't understand the best way of building an immune system comes from the baby itself. We (our bodies) are perfectly capable of fighting diseases on its own. I'm glad I had the choice to opt out so my kids will not be vaccinated at least until they're 3 years old.
Luckily I see more and more awareness on this topic and more people are open to discuss it. Keep these posts coming, we need more people opening their eyes.
Excellent comment @alies89. Are people forced to be vaccinated in your part of the world? Why 3 for your kids?
Thank you! Luckily we're not forced to vaccinate. What I meant was that I will not vaccinate my kids until they are at least 3 years old because the first 3 years are the most important for a child's brain development meaning I will never unneseccesarily traumatize them or put things in their bodies that don't belong there.
Herd immunity ? You mean a measles party ;)
Excellent work my friend and indeed to try and make people understand that it's actually the unvaccinated that need protecting from the vaccinated is an uphill struggle!! I remember seeing an interview with a big pharma CEO a few years back. He was told that due to their over prescription and prevelance in the food chain diseases were becoming immune to antibiotics . He was also told that this was potentially one of the greatest risks to the health and stability of humanity! His answer was basically well if we make specialist antibiotics not as many people can take them so we won't make as much money and as such won't pursue this line of research! Now don't get me wrong I avoid antibiotics like the plague but equally if you have a nasty wound that turns septic of course as a one off you're going to seek them out!
So when faced with a potential future humanitarian disaster they shrug their shoulders because it doesn't offer enough monetary reward and yet because vaccines are cheap to produce and consumed by the masses they're prepared to pump them out all day!! That statement alone tells you all you need to know about big pharma, it's all about the money and as such we are simply cash cows of the highest order!!
Well said @perceptualflaws - thank you!
Enjoy the vote and reward!
For those bashing this post. Here is another reason to have seconds doubts about vaccines and the effects they have on a human body.
Your selective omission of data to further your narrative is appalling, as is your accusations that scientists stand to blame for your misplaced fears.
You say "In health and truth", yet promote neither of these with the continued misuse of the "Science" tag and cherry-picked data.
Did you make those pie charts all by yourself? This would be considered "analysis" only by those who lack basic scientific literacy.
If you're going to talk ridiculous shit about an entire community (of which the STEM community is the only reason for your relevance and ability to monetize this drivel) than be prepared for some warranted backlash.
If you read the article (and my previous one) you would know that the graphs and the study were carried out and written by Dr Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. If you have an issue with it take it up with him.
Enjoy the vote and reward!
You cite a single study as infallible proof? You are scientifically illiterate then. I don't even mean that as an insult; it's just matter of fact. This is actually problematic and shows a fundamental misunderstanding of science.
I say that as a scientist, and as someone who was formerly part of the conspiratorial crowd and quasi-spiritual neo-hippy community. I understand the thinking and reasoning behind all this, and it is flawed. I have been wrong before, and the hardest part was realizing how wrong I was to uphold such narratives that harmed others; all the while I acted so self-righteous with an imagined self-importance.
If we can help, please let us know. Until then, don't talk shit about science then use it in a tag as if you understand it at all.
It seems that you are the illeterate one as you seem to have trouble reading and discerning - you've done it twice in two comments so you have a 100% strike-rate.
Clearly you have not properly reviewed or understood the post and the sources that the data came from. The data came from multiple studies, in multiple nations for 7 different diseases.
If you can't read a simple post and understand it why should I listen to you? You are clearly biased which may explain why you are cherry-picking sections of the post and ignoring others. The irony is that this is what you are accusing me of!
The sciences were bought and paid for over 100 years ago. Most scientists do not know this, most of them are good people that mean well but unfortunately most of them are deceived.
Maybe you will listen to what these scientists have to say about medical and scientific studies?
"Most scientists don't know this. Click here to find out why!" is basically how most of this material reads. Make better clickbait before you tag Science again.
You said: "If you read the article (and my previous one) you would know that the graphs and the study were carried out and written by Dr Raymond Obomsawin Ph.D. If you have an issue with it take it up with him."
GIven that statement and the terms "study" (singular) and a singular person given direction to, yeah, I'll have my skepticism of your interpretation of someone else interpreting their results, especially when they perpetuate a dangerous anti-science narrative.
What happens when I get to three strikes? Does your entire community come and smite big bad science to exercise their moral supremacy and absolutism?
? what do u mean
It reflects the truth, unfortunately. I experienced a really bad influenza right after i was vaccinated. I don't really get caught diseases. But that vaccine gave me terrible two weeks. Furthermore, i didn't hear from anybody that influenza vaccine ever works. So i never use any since then and never will.
Good for you, stay away from them and let your body and diet do the work.
Food is medicine!
We have nutritional deficiencies from nature not drug deficiencies from science;)
crazy experience right. we here, have to fight mosquitoes and what not during influenza.
crazy ass vaccines!
Those are really sad findings. How do you trust BIG PHARMA. Around every corner there are some kind of mistruths meaning they just did not get it right, but failed to report that they messed up, and in other cases there are just lies for money! The best thing you can do is try to stay as healthy as you can, so that you do not have to deal with them.
That sums it up pretty well. Thank you!
I'm only now starting to grasp the scope and depth of your posts - they are too old to vote on now, but I'm going to start reading all your old posts.
And each time I go wow that was brilliant I'll come back to your latest post and upvote one of your comments to make up for not upvoting one of your posts the first time.
Many thanks.
What an awesome comment, thank you @sift666
Feel free to join our discord channel Truth - Politics - Conspiracies under PAL (Peace, Abundance, Liberty). You will find lots of friendly and awake people and we support each other and our content.
All truth tellers and seekers are welcome to join us!
Thanks for sharing this post @steemtruth. Over 90% of the world today believe that vaccines are capable of preventing most diseases
propaganda and social engineering are very subtle, powerful and effective techniques to get anyone to think almost anything, given the right stimuli and environment. Thanks for the support, it's appreciated.
Upvoted thanks !
#truthtrain
#vaccinesharm
An this ladies and gentleman is why i dont believe in flu shots and never received them even as a kid. You can either read up on it or just hear me say this.. YOUR GIVING YOUR BODY A DISEASE YOU NEVER HAD TO PREVENT FROM GETTING A DISEASE YOU NEVER HAD OR NEVER WILL HAVE . Its that simple and if anybody doesnt understand that then you should probably go swimming with your socks on...actually just throw on an extra pair, it wont hurt right...
Your body
Your choice
Your responsibility
My body
My choice
My responsibility
You are on your own if something goes wrong
No liability
No accountability
Good luck in court if you are injured
#truthtrain
I totally agree with u, in developing countries, vaccines are seen as saviours, and which they are not
Congratulations. You are doing a great job by warning about the risk of the vaccines (which are often minimized by the mass media and several medical journals).
i agree with you
you do make sense and like all important things, it is easy to say and hard to do. Best wishes from Lahore, Pakistan
thanks for sharing your knowledge
Thanks for reading it and commenting @saddam1210
For herd immunity to work properly, most people in the population need to be vaccinated. The exact rate depends on the disease; in the case of measles, 19 out of 20 people need to be vaccinated to protect the population. When measles vaccination levels drop below this level, outbreaks and epidemics become more common. So if you decide not to vaccinate because you think that herd immunity will protect you, you are making it less likely that you will be protected.
The best example
A very noteworthy study was published in 2013, looking at baboons, which are susceptible and manifest whooping cough like humans do. In the study by Warfel, baboons who were either vaccinated or not vaccinated were later exposed to pertussis bacteria, something that cannot be done experimentally in humans (due to ethical considerations), but which yields very important data. Expectedly, the baboons that had never been infected got the cough and remained colonized with bacteria for a maximum of 38 days. Baboons that were previously vaccinated and immune vaccine-style, became colonized upon later exposure for a longer time than the naïve baboons; 42 days. However unvaccinated baboons that recovered naturally and were later exposed to the bacteria did not become colonized at all – zero days.
So, who is providing better herd immunity in the face of bacterial exposure? Vaccinated individuals who presume they are immune, yet remain asymptomatically colonized for 42 days spreading bacteria? Unvaccinated kids who get infected and remain colonized for 38 days? Or the naturally convalesced who are not able to be colonized and therefore do not spread bacteria at all upon re-exposure? Better still: natural convalescence makes for decades longer, solid immunity than vaccination.
http://www.pnas.org/content/111/2/787.abstract
You should read the article you're referencing. They're comparing two different types of vaccines and showing that an older one works better. You're cherry picking from the vaccine that didn't perform as well. The paper itself demonstrates that both vaccines have benefits and concludes with a pro-vaccine sentiment:
Benefits who?
Paul Offit ?
When something happens to you it is all risk no benefits .
Truth is an experience
I for certain do know that these vaccines are administered to the body to enable it be defended from infection for the time being as the body matures and manufactures its own defence mechanism through the anti bodies. However, continued use of anti biotics and other drugs makes the body system susceptible to attacks at a later stage of one's lifecycle and the reason being that one's body becomes used to these drugs meaning that even though these are administered continuously, the viruses in the body will act resistant.
Very interesting post!
Very interesting to see.
Big finger up!
Hi :)
When we talk about vaccination for tuberculosis I totally agree with you. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is changing and mutating so fast that this vaccination is not a good idea. In some countries is not even recommended. However, I cannot agree with some of your statements. This correlation is shouldn't be considered just for a vaccinations people. We should take into consideration raise of a population, access to the health services and so on. You are right that improving quality of life and hygiene we will reduce incidence but vaccinations might help us to fight with it.
Do not hesitate to discuss!
Very interesting post... Go to @maleudi upvote follow
les vaccins ne sont pas efficace en ne les utilisant pas les citoyens préserveront leur sante et les état on ne les achetant pas gagneraient les sorties des devises
i dont agree in anyway
Graphs without statistical analysis or knowledge of confounds are useless. Confounds such as them spanning so many years that detection improves so it isn't an actual true increase or increased risky behavior due to the vaccine."Highly vaccinated population" only applies when 95% of the population is vaccinated. People under 2 and the elderly have much weaker immune systems which wouldn't be expected to respond as well to the vaccine. Antibody production is used because it is very unethical to purposefully expose people to diseases or to refuse them treatment. Plus you are omitting some very effective vaccines like smallpox being virtually eradicated as well as cervical cancer rates dropping precipitously due to the HPV vaccine. Cherry picking data just shows that you are biased. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22336803 shows that the MMR vaccine has 92% efficacy of preventing infection when in contact with an infected household member.
Upvote please
very interesting
A recent post makes a solid case that this post is either cherry picking data or simply misinterprets data in the papers it references.
https://steemit.com/health/@sco/investigating-the-truth-behind-steemtruth-s-truth-part-2-vaccines-increase-your-chances-of-catching-infectious-disease