There's no way I can honestly argue the 'pro' side of that debate. Forcibly injecting me is a crime. Forcibly injecting many is a crime against humanity.
There is also no such thing as settled science. If science were settled every time some scientist or other has said it was, scientists would be extinct. Every time some guru or another says 'This is the way it is! It is absolutely fact!', soon there is some revision, or even a complete revolution in the science.
That, in fact, is the point of science.
If you just want a shill to defeat, and you're paying well, I am sure you can find someone to verbally abuse.
I'm just a terrible liar, so you'll need someone else =p
Agreed. Arguing "the science is settled" about pretty much anything in a debate is a sucker's move, and especially in this particular debate, where the anti-vax side has so much evidence (of various quality) of exceptions to the rule.