You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Value Plan Q1 2025 Proposal

in #valueplan5 days ago

LMFAO 🤣

https://afrolegends.com/2019/01/08/turning-air-into-drinking-water-an-african-invention/

https://genevasolutions.news/explorations/11-african-solutions-for-the-future-world/air-an-unexpected-source-of-drinking-water-thanks-to-this-kenyan-invention

There's plenty more innovative ideas that work to bring drinkable water to an entire country, if they only used those damn cellphones for something proactive instead of Fed-booking.

Sort:  

I think these ideas are excellent and can be replicable. Now, as you are an expert in innovation, explain to me how we do not damage the ecosystem and transfer the water from the springs, by osmosis? Do you think it is feasible? I don't know, I wait 🙏 for your humble opinions. Help me to make my project, without altering its ecosystem, perfectible.

It's your land. Your people know it best. Search for the ideas available in the vast space of information called the web. Maybe you heard of it, and experiment what works. But if you never try.. well... Expect more of the same

This response seems to fall into what's known as an appeal to ignorance fallacy. It suggests that because no specific solution is provided, the best course of action is for you to experiment blindly, without any guidance on how to mitigate ecological damage. If the aim is to innovate in a way that respects and preserves the ecosystem, then merely pointing out the vastness of the internet or suggesting local knowledge is enough, doesn't actually advance the conversation or offer practical advice. If you're not going to provide a logical response or help in figuring out a solution that tackles the complexities of water transfer and ecosystem preservation, it might be best not to respond at all. However, I'm interested in understanding if there's another perspective or perhaps some initial thoughts on how we might approach this challenge without falling back on such fallacies?