This very detailed analysis goes through a widely-covered opinion piece which claimed vaping could be as bad as smoking and and permitting e-cigarettes would worsen health. The level of deception and misdirection required to publish this claim is incredible, as this piece demonstrates.
The asshole academics and 'public health experts' producing this kind of work should be held to account the same way tobacco executives were, if there is any legal route to do so. Like those CEOs, they are deliberately withholding essential information and going out of their way to misinform people, at a likely cost of millions of lives.
The exact reverse of Prof Glantz' claims is true: vaping is much safer than smoking and can improve health by helping people quit.
It's an egregious form of professional malpractice, made even worse by the fact that these people aren't working for a private company, but rather are mostly on the public payroll and meant to be pursuing the public interest!
Around $10 per post, zero engagement, and 11 followers after starting on Steemit in November 2019.
What’s going on here, human?
I don't expect a cat in a tub to understand the intricacies of a decentralised social media platform.
Have a treat though!
The Cat in a Tub will observe.
Your content is good though. Good work, human.
So it appears that @jawnz is the owner of this account and @honeybee is the owner of @jawnz, who joined Steemit back in 2016. I’m assuming that you also own the @clappy account however I haven’t looked at that one.
I think I’ve solved this not so interesting mystery.
Congratulations @pomeline! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPTo support your work, I also upvoted your post!
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!