You either didn't read or did not understand the link I gave you, because for one thing they did not administer a vaccine in the control, and for another thing even if they did, actually understanding the outcome of the study still disproves the 1 in 912 claim.
That's cute that you're calling me a "pharma troll" and a "liar" and all that crap, when really I'm a chemist and you're just some dingus on the internet taking part in a hysteria over something you don't understand. The problem is with your lack of scientific understanding. Maybe try getting a degree in biochemistry and revisit this anti-vaxx shit. If you can't, then consider not spreading false claims over things you don't understand.
Also, there are plenty of studies on long-term effects of vaccines. All you need to do to find them is be scientifically literate enough to know what search terms to put into pubmed, google scholar, etc. and then be able to read them. But you can't do that, so you're ignoring them and instead getting biased information from dumb infographics you find on the internet, as if that's a real source.
Oh yes they do..
Vaccines have been used as control to hide the toxic effect of the new vaccines..
Otherwise talk to the hand.
While you are at it. show me the vax v unvxed study, yea that's right, the one they refuse to do because they already know the answer. However every non pharma vax / unxaxed study clearly show that the unvaccinated are far healthier, that is exactly what doctors are now observing for themselves.. Science, you clearly do not know the meaning of the word, so don't waste my time with junk
Congrats on not responding to my post and just being obnoxious. You're a complete fucking idiot.
Your junk is now worth responding to, but do ask for a pay rise from them as they spend half their cash on propaganda and bribes rather than R&D..
lol you think I work for a pharma company? that's hilarious. proud to be a part of your conspiracy theory.
clearly the vaccines have messed with your head