Loses posts with regularity..that's news to me. I haven't lost any posts. And I'm sure you're aware of the ddos attacks that are causing the glitches. This site being enough of a threat to be under attack is an excellent sign actually. Considering it happened right after the announcement of the social media tokens they intend to release that are far more user friendly than any current competitor, it's even to be expected.
I have no idea what an sjw is.
If you spent hours researching and putting together a post then someone came along and took that post, changed a few words, and called it theirs, you might understand why she felt the need to address it. You spoke about where the line was on what's considered copying, I might ask you the same thing. If there is no line, then someone could take one of Stephen King's books, change the wording in some chapters and a few scenes and call it theirs--is that fine with you? If so we have a difference of opinion that can't be resolved.
It has nothing to do with morals, just simple respect for other people. At least that's what it is about for me, and why I bothered to come here and say something to you. I' all for self-governance, but it would seem that a certain level of maturity is needed to do that effectively.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
SJW = Social Justice Warrior.
You haven't addressed whether you understand the concept of fair use, and I don't see Cheetah or the steemcleaners here so then the original post can't be plagiarism.
Have a nice day and consider using your thinks in the future, your feels don't matter.
I've learned what an SJW is, and I honestly feel it applies to you far more than her in this situation. Serious irony in that, as there is in you referring to me as a white knight. Except I'm defending a friend where as you seem to be defending your own opinions all based on fractional understanding of what you're talking about.
For instance, I'm fully aware of Fair Use, you're the one who is confused about it.
Fair Use:
the doctrine that brief excerpts of copyright material may, under certain circumstances, be quoted verbatim for purposes such as criticism, news reporting, teaching, and research, without the need for permission from or payment to the copyright holder
I would say that the words BRIEF EXCERPTS completely invalidate your argument that this post- before they included the link to @canadian-coconut's original work- falls under Fair Use.
Again, some irony in the whole "use your thinks and not your feels", every comment of yours makes it very clear that your emotions are involved.
Have a lovely day yourself ;)
Oh, can you show me where anybody here copyrights their stuff? Show me the copyright, I'll wait here.
Seriously? It's the blockchain, it's copyrighted the moment its put up. People used to copyright by sending whatever it was to themselves through the mail, then email was enough when that came out.
All copyrighting is, is proof you're the original author...yeah, I'm pretty sure the blockchain has that covered. I would have thought you'd be the type to laugh at people asking if they should copyright their stuff before posting it, lol.
Do you always fabricate your nonsense or just use urban legends?
A little research on some of the stuff you spew would do you some good... Damn, I'm letting myself be baited by a troll, aren't I? I have a friend on here who does this, fortunately since he is my friend he doesn't do it to me lol.
This is the end of the free education from me to you.
https://petapixel.com/2017/06/.../no-blockchain-doesnt-replace-copyright-registration/