I don’t think that you and I fundamentally agree on the premise of fighting for the rights of oppressed minorities and on that basis this argument probably isn’t going to go anywhere. There’s no reason to fight for rights for straight people in the context of sexual orientation equality or white people in the context of racial discrimination when their rights aren’t an issue in those contexts. You can fight for the rights of white people who are victims of sex trafficking, for instance, because there is an issue there. There are solid rebuttals for everything you said with respect to “black on black crime” but it doesn’t sound like any minds are going to be changed here so probably best that we don’t go further into it.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I never said anything close to that, you just want to distort what I'm saying because you have no logical argument to back you up. It wasn't fighting for rights of straight people but including them instead of ostracizing them in the LGBT stuff that's only identity politics aimed at dividing people further. You still didn't answer as to why LGBT and BLM is so good when they are more destructive and divisive than they are inclusive nor as to why you only hear those kind of protests in the West for things that aren't that important while in South Africa for instance, where whites are being victims of terrible violence everyone keeps their mouth shut because it doesn't fit the narrative that blacks are oppressed and whites are the evil demons.
I have plenty of logical arguments but I’m politely declining to further engage in a pointless back and forth when we’ve both already solidified our beliefs. Personally I find your argumentation offensive and I don’t particularly feel that you’ve considered my points or even really responded to them, but I don’t want to get into a heated argument of ad hominems.
I do believe in fighting for rights of oppressed minorities, never said the contrary. If you have logical arguments to debate me then you should do it, if I'm wrong then I'd like to know that :)
What's exactly offensive about my argumentation?