Links are not always appreciated in comments.... and lately links can be scams/phising also.
So maybe it is not so bad what @roninphilosophy did ;)
Also people who are voluntaryist write volutaryism sometimes as voluntarism....so the mistake is understandable i.m.h.o. I'm a voluntaryist myself and was a little confused also as to how to interpret the post.
Voluntaryism or (volutarism) anarcho-capitalism are pratically the same, libertarians are still busy in the political process, but a lot of them are voluntaryist too, some are minarchist.
In regard to volunteering, I think it is ok only if it's done with consent. If I mow the lawn for my neighbors because I like them out of my own incentive, without being threatened or forced everything's ok.
Volunteering without consent is slavery.
I edited my initial (root) post and added definitions I did not expect to be needed.
I did not expect from people whom use a word to define themselves or their agenda to not know what it means.
Volunteering without consent is not like a car without wheels, it is like a car with no wheels, seats, engine, pedals, steering system.
The example with a car just does not nail it, so I should think of a better equivalent.
(...thinking...)
To volunteer without consent is like to be raped out of consent.
Here.
I found a dual analogy for you.
I hope, but am less certain that it is clear enough.
To add more clarity, I will think about another example:
(...thinking...)
To volunteer without consent is like to walk without feet, and with no prostheses either, to make it clearer.
It is like to nod without a head.
It is like to shit without an ass hole.
It is like to shit without shit, and I do not mean to try to shit, I mean to shit.
You guys turn me into a poet.
You got a 21.55% upvote from @proffit courtesy of @stimialiti!
You got a 11.95% upvote from @luckyvotes courtesy of @stimialiti!
You got a 7.93% upvote from @sleeplesswhale courtesy of @stimialiti!