It seems like you’re happier about awareness concerning philosophical disagreements than about peacefully dismantling the federal government.
Another personal jab, right off the bat.
If people like Adam or Ron Paul or whoever decrease the amount of time the Federal government exists, I will support that. I want forward progress, not debate club infighting.
How is pointing out that someone is going to violate the individual self-ownership of others “infighting”?
Did you really remove your self vote and re-add it again with more power in order to be at the top of the comments on my post even after I made it clear I have no interest in discussing this again with you?
Yes, I really did! Is that unbelievable to you, Luke? I did this after you buried my comment by upvoting all the others.
You are so smug man. And still terribly religious, I’m afraid, for all your empty talk about being rational and logical. The fact is, you’re very condescending sometimes, man.
It’s sad, and an embarrassment to the rest of us Voluntaryists out here actually interested in principle.
I almost always vote up comments I like by around 5%. That's not "burying" your comment. I did not upvote "all" the others. You talk about personal attacks but then call me "smug" "terribly religious" (!?!) "condescending" and "an embarrassment."
Yes, you are all of those things. At least, you have been to myself and others. Someone ought to tell you. You’ll probably ignore it anyway. It probably just means the person saying it is “just jealous,” or “irrational.” Not that they care about the issue being discussed. To claim rationality and resort to those kind of attacks, as you have with me, and then to laughably accuse me of being a “troll” for asking questions is pretty religious. Looks like you’ve traded one religion for another.
I’m just here to talk about Voluntaryism. No need to jab me about reupvoting a comment.
Glad others are now here to see you defend the charlatan scammer.