Ah, I said it from the start. Aggressive.
You asked me how you could get your content more headway.
Apparently you had already decided on what that response should be.
I suggested one way. I suggested voting for more people. I did not say you hadn't voted sufficiently for my taste.
From what I have seen of your attitude in our short discourse I am not surprised that people don't vote for you.
Good luck ;0)
Very interesting. Consistently turning the tables on the other person to make you appear the victim. Very interesting and very telling. Once again, read the content.
I am quite the helpful sort. I quite often go out of my way to help people. From the start of the conversation you have been aggressive. And at no point have I painted myself the victim. Believe me, I ain't no victim.
Why would I read it now when you have been unpleasant and accusatory toward me?
It's all in the blockchain now.
The reason I mentioned the voting is not to have a go at you. It was to highlight that there is more to being successful on this platform than just putting out content.
Well, in fact, you did have a go at me..multiple times already throughout the chain and tried also to paint it as me instead.
Let's look at a quote from you before my last comment, "From what I have seen of your attitude in our short discourse I am not surprised that people don't vote for you."
And yes, it's all in the blockchain. Thanks for calling that out..
Haaaaahaaahahahaaaaaa.
Love it
I vote for MI Lord, always.....due to his solid contents...have you seen Thursday with Mr Boom? Hiyaaaaaaaaaaaaa
Wayhay, likewise with the solid contents Mr C!