Reward disagreement is one of the legit uses of the down vote. If an individual thinks the reward is to great they can lower the payout, he did not lower it a whole lot, and at least you did not get a visit by grumpycat. I can see the use of the word lame if the downvote was on the payout and no vote bots at all were used, then it would be lame. But honestly what is more lame, buying votes or someone downvoting a post that purchased votes? I have never had a post go over I think 15 dollars, but I do not and will not buy votes. I do not care if others want to sell their vote, or if people want to buy votes, the vote after all belongs to the vote owner, the SDB belongs to the buyer, the reward pool belongs to everyone, and someone sees a hand reaching to deep they use their flags.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: