You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Dishonest MSM & Deep State Continue to Push the Fake News Psy-Op

in #war7 years ago (edited)

Marxist as in: "it couldn't be capitalism because that's what I believe in, so it must be the other thing"? =D you people make me laugh so hard. Capitalism won, there are no hidden marxists coming for your enlighted society. I mean, there are marxist but they don't have any kind of power. Power is in the hands of the same Rothschild bankers you mentioned, and HELL THEY ARE NOT MARXIST! Marxism is their cryptonite... they have worked diligently to smear and destroy anything different from Neoliberalism.

On the other hand I'm glad you have figured out this "Fake news" propaganda campaign to eliminate free speech on the internet, but in the end what they want to silence are exactly those your kind of people call "cultural marxists"... that is, people capable of criticizing their own culture, unlike you. And I'm also glad you understand that Hillary Clinton is a criminal, too bad you can't figure out Trump is more of the same, how could he not be??

Sort:  

Yes, there are flaws in the system. You've got the wrong idea if you think the article supports Crony Capitalism. But, at least you got a free chuckle. Now, if you'd like something else for free, here you go:

From Conservapedia:

The central idea of Cultural Marxism is to soften up and prepare Western Civilization for economic Marxism after a gradual, relentless, sustained attack on every institution of Western culture, including schools, literature, art, film, the Judeo-Christian religious tradition, the family, sexual mores, national sovereignty, etc.[5] The attacks are usually framed in Marxist terms as a class struggle between oppressors and oppressed; the members of the latter class allegedly include women, minorities, homosexuals, and adherents of non-Western religions such as Islam.

Do you see any parallels to what's going on today?

As for criticism, there is lots of time for that. For now, as many people from across the political spectrum need to unite to effect change in the corrupt system (including dirty Republicans, Democrats and their corrupt lobbyiest friends). Just because the Establishment players are not living this lifestyle doesn't mean they are not running it.

I also got a good chuckle about your condescending assumptions , so THANKS!

Yes, there are flaws in the system.

The system is fine, it's just wasn't made to work to our benefit. It's made so power and wealth remain where it is. Status quo.

The central idea of Cultural Marxism is to soften up and prepare Western Civilization for economic Marxism after a gradual, relentless, sustained attack on every institution of Western culture...

In that case we'll have to wait and see, I guess, since it's only preparing it by the moment. Perhaps in the future it will take over and I'll concede you were right. Is it a concerted effort? Who's involved, where does it gets its funding? From your definition I infer the attack is rhetoric, isn't it? Are they consciously lying in order to bring about economic marxism? In other words, is it a conspiracy or just people criticizing their own culture and proposing different approaches and ideas because the honestly think that way?

Sorry for making so many questions but I can't make any sense of such a concept.

Should we not criticize our own culture and traditions, perhaps only to a point but no further, not in its most basic structure? I think I own it to all the losing side of the spectrum, those who are the victims of my society and culture, it's just that, I don't have any kind of grudge or bad intentions towards nobody personally. I just think our society is our responsibility.

For now, as many people from across the political spectrum need to unite to effect change in the corrupt system

I agree, but change what exactly? change in what terms? what's the nature of the corruption that affects our society?

I had started yet another lengthy reply but, do you see all those zeros? You received an exceedingly polite response considering your initial disrespect. There is not enough time to debate differing philosophies when that time is need for research and new content. I didn't see the title of Editor next to your name, so take care. I will respectfully refrain from commenting on your content, even in the likely case that I won't agree with all of it.