I neither have, nor care for, diamonds. I have people, and care about little else.
War is a multiplicity of industries, and the most horrible of them all, worse than the basal propaganda that seeks to keep us all on the treadmill that powers it, worse than the murderous weaponry that devours the victims of the warmongers, is the ultimate expression of power that Kakacrats love most: slaves.
Nothing says power like owning people, and particularly children. The more innocent and vulnerable, the more the evil and megalomaniacal desire to defile and hurt. Organs are really the secondary product of slavery, and while the wealthy that can afford transplants add a few years from that aftermarket harvest, what has the most impact on their perceived quality of life is sex slaves, and those innocent little kids are the cream of that crop.
It is not an impossible task to identify and track people - the documents we all must carry show just how ubiquitous such control is. It is actually difficult to hide slavery, because of the mechanisms of control that have been imposed on humanity. Yet we are confronted with the fact that millions of children have been trafficked in the last few decades out of the wartorn nations of the world.
This is only happening because we haven't put our attention on these matters, and have allowed media to distract us from real people in real need, with alarmist screeching about Trump, global warming, or immigration.
One window into this horrifying industry, the commerce of human beings, is transplants. I reckon we need to establish provenance, as is done for artwork, or diamonds, for every organ, every tissue or fluid, that is supplied to the rich beneficiaries of stolen bodies, stolen lives.
Screw art. Screw diamonds, gold, or taxes.
Let's fully document every transplant origin, in every jurisdiction where they are conducted, and end the enslavement and parting out of children by the murder machine that is the permanent war against humanity conducted by profiteers empowered by politics, paid for by wall street, and coordinated by the network of evil overlords and their philanthropathic foundations.
As @pathforger points out, many people considering transplants have no desire to harm anyone, and more than anyone else those in that position must need certainty that the material they receive is lawfully obtained. I had only considered those vile enough to wish another to die so their organs can be stolen. That was a foolish oversight on my part, and caused entirely by my instant decision to write this post, rather than properly devote some time to doing so.
Maybe we can use the blockchain, as @pathforger suggests, to record our DNA in a secure registry, so that when our organs show up on the market, the origin of that genetic material can be proved. When kids from Syria, Libya, or some other fresh hell on Earth are stripped and sold as parts to gluttonous fiends willing to sacrifice them for a just a few more moments of lascivious lust, just like their model forebear, Elizabeth Bathory, that DNA record will reveal the origin of the parts - and then we can reveal the network of ghouls that have profited from murder, as well as deny demons seeking to live forever on the death of children, while allowing lawfully obtained material to be used appropriately, and for transplant recipients to be certain they have caused no one harm.
Who's with me?
Those are very strong words and your sentiments vivid and fortified by passion.
I can only wonder at what triggered this post on this day of this month and year... but you are absolutely right - that which you describe is indeed evil.
Without need to demonize the perpetrators and customers of such evil acts (as for one party, their actions speak for themselves - while the others wrap themselves in hollow justifications and absolution).
While I'm not sure about DNA being woven into a cryptocurrency - I am more sure about DNA being woven into the blockchain. I absolutely agree that an improvement in the transparent documentation of individuals and their attributes is a correct way forwards.
Thank you again for writing about this.
I write from the hip. Sometimes I gotta spit the flow, or the flow will split me. I cannot countenance the overflow of evil that overwhelms me, and I search for answers, how to reach my personal goal of humanity that forever enjoys each others good company.
Of course you are absolutely correct to point out that the blockchain is the proper vehicle for this. I also am beyond hesitant to craft a tool of tyranny, and it is easy to see many ways such a registry might be used for evil.
There's smarter people in the room than I, as you have here proved, and if I can have a bad idea that leads to your good one, I am fulfilled. Mebbe there's someone that might be able to conceive of a way for this to be ubiquitous, and required to be reported before a transplant can be done, even of spit, that might not be harmful to liberty.
I do know that good people are damn tired of evil destroying children, families, and communities for profit. If we can get a sound plan together, I will give everything I have to cause it to succeed.
Edit: thank you for pointing out that not all customers of transplants are informed participants in harming others. I had, in my outrage, but considered those transplant tourists that can be all but certain to be receiving conflict corpses. It was wrong of me to do, and I am but glad that nothing I proposed to undertake could prevent lawfully obtained transplant material from saving the lives of good people.
It is not my intent in any way. I know that I would not want to receive a transplant from a person killed for their organs, even at the cost of my own life, and I am sure that most would not either. Perhaps more than any other group, those considering transplants should desire to prove the organs they may receive are lawfully obtained.
It is important to strike the iron while its hot. I cannot count the times I've written a Steemit post title only to delete it a few minutes later as the emotion passes. As such I commend you for bringing this to light.
While I appreciate your recognition I cannot accept the insinuation that I am smarter than you. Even if such were so, I have still found that my interactions with you have enriched my thinking.
I fully understand the burning need to do something about the evil in this World - and I quite agree that such is necessary. That being said it is important to proceed steady and without an excess of haste - the probability of success at stake.
Your stated hesitance to craft a tool that could be abused for purposes tyrannical is warranted - as we do live in such a World. As such - the simpler (and not necessarily optimal) path is to track DNA patterns. As people interact with health services for any invasive reason - a DNA sample is also taken - and the event is recorded upon the blockchain - without personal details.
As such, when a person from New York moves around the World and interacts with various health services, the DNA itself is tracked.
Should an organ of undocumented DNA be discovered then the blockchain would reveal this - along with probable sources (DNA proximity) with sufficient evidence upon which to mount an investigation.
This may sound a little cold, but I regard all ages and genders as being equally worthy of freedom and a chance at a happy life. It may be due to my recognizing that children are often (ab)used by media so as to further their opinion-engineering purposes via emotional blackmail.
I was not laying any judgment upon you for your impassioned condemnation of all players in the sad affairs of sex and organ trafficking. Sometimes being biased is a good thing - as it motivates action.
Yes, some clients are unaware - while others are blinded by fear and/ or selfishness (often with a dose of ignorance either of perspective or a blissful unawareness).
I would suggest that even those who would be condemned for actions taken bear a closer look. Sometimes things are not all that they seem - and as one who believes that we all share the same roots, regardless of how inconvenient such may occasionally seem - my personal focus is upon correction.
This would necessitate the identification of the person, and therefore the DNA would need to be linked to personal data. There seems no way around this.
Another issue is that DNA can be used to attack computers. DNA can be crafted so that computers analyzing it are infected with malware, as unlikely as this seems. This may not be hard to prevent, but I cannot myself consider how this might be achieved. I am not competent.
Neither can I think of a way that a publicly auditable blockchain might be prevented from being abused by any number of entities.
I agree that punitive intent is pointless. Rather the prevention of harm is what I seek.
Thanks!
I am not sure if I explained my thought on this well enough. :c)
Imagine a blockchain thread of information that is not linked to your name or your ID but to your DNA.
Furthermore that information is not at any point linked to the person.
If you have a procedure where you gain a kidney, on the blockchain, there is a link between your DNA and the other person's DNA - and that's it. There is 'point-of-contact' and your non-blockchain medical history will (probably) still indicate that you had a transplant - but your blockchain self is considered separately from yourself.
This promotes transparent access to and processing of data on the blockchain - without compromising personal data. Or at least - its as near to such a situation as I can presently envision.
As for computers being infected by [insert file-type here] - once upon a time it was images, then it was flash files. Now it seems to be DNA. These are exploits that are either not envisioned - or deliberately designed into systems (Y2K).
Its only a matter of time before a blockchain AI virus comes to be. 'WZ2100 Nexus' anyone? ;c)
In any case - this is the problem with following through with accountable transparency as a data policy. It inherently crosses privacy.
Thank you again for the insights - and stop knocking yourself on the blockchain. :cP
What I was alluding to earlier was that absent information regarding the identity of the donor of the material, such a record would not prevent organ theft/murder. Since all of us can be donors, all our identities would be necessarily included. Absent identifying information, and public auditability, I cannot see how such a system might pose a hazard to illegally obtained material, and those that purvey it.
I don't reckon I am knocking myself if I simply acknowledge my limitations. I consider that a feature, not a flaw =p
The idea is that if a person to receive a transplant, and the DNA of the organ itself can be traced to a particular location - as the DNA itself has a history - then it would be far more difficult to pass off conflict organs as legitimate.
Why? Because from birth there would be information about such organs - and in the absence of such - or in the event that the data indicates overlap with potential risk factors - such as presence in a conflict zone - then flags are raised.
In the event of genuine donors in conflict zones - I am sure that appropriate seals of approval can bridge the gap.
Of course - at contact with the medical system - the person is associated with a DNA blockchain - through his or her DNA. But its as disassociated as one can be - I reckon.
And glad to hear you're not knocking yourself. Feature noted. ;c)
LOL I can always tell when I'm pissed, cuz I start making up my own words =p
One does not throw stones in glass houses and thus I shall not. ;c)
Sybil defense. ;cP
Thats a really sensitive issue you have raised here. These are the kind of things that you wish would just go away, which you pray are probably false and exaggerated, which they probably aren't.
What can the netizens do?
My reply to @pathforger above is a better idea than the OP. It needs to be better conceived yet, and pushed forward, or any other way that might promise to prevent war profiteering and the hell it brings to men, women, and children.
Taking the profit out of harvesting organs and sex trafficking, is a start - and the best one I can think of.
Was just discussing this with my husband. We were reading the stories on ourrescue.org and it is just sickening. The more light that is shone on darkness the better!
My idea was just that no transplant should be done unless provenance of the genetic material can be proved, in order to prevent illegal organ harvesting, and the same registry can also be used to track trafficked sex slaves, to help prove they are trafficked, and extract them from their torment.
Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOP