@hivewatchers - Your response(s) have an air of coercion about them. Is this a right interpretation? My comment above is intended lovingly and peacefully to assert my highest Right to a non-contraversial rapport with another living being: it does NOT affirm ANY entry into controversy on my part, and your response appears to be suggesting that I should be being 'marked' in some way - effectively for having an innocent online rapport with another Hive member/ profile.
The fact that I have not been exposed directly to any wrongdoing by @davideownzall does NOT implicate me in any wrongdoing.
Please Cease and Desist in tainting my good intention, solid reputation and high energetic vibration on Hive.
@hivewatchers - Your response(s) have an air of coercion about them. Is this a right interpretation? My comment above is intended lovingly and peacefully to assert my highest Right to a non-contraversial rapport with another living being: it does NOT affirm ANY entry into controversy on my part, and your response appears to be suggesting that I should be being 'marked' in some way - effectively for having an innocent online rapport with another Hive member/ profile.
The fact that I have not been exposed directly to any wrongdoing by @davideownzall does NOT implicate me in any wrongdoing.
Please Cease and Desist in tainting my good intention, solid reputation and high energetic vibration on Hive.
Calling @vincentnijman @kesityu.fashion and @samstonehill as witness to this conversation.
In Sovereignty and Peace,
All Rights Embodied and Living,
I removed the blacklist on that account.
Hi.
We did not implicate any wrongdoing.
I simply mentioned that I took your note.