You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Ecency waves Jul 10

in #waves5 months ago

Yeppers, it sure is, and that's exactly what she said! It's correct except for the 'the' before 'Mary', which should be 'what'.)

I wonder if any of them have figured out a way to have AI engage for them, because this is not human! 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

Sort:  

Right! Wanted to write “the word”, but obviously forgot a “word” 😂
And yup, I assume so as well… I’ve been thinking about this possibility, that they are doing it like that, and checked it out technically, and had it set up 90% fairly fast.
90%, because I never made the actual connection, as I didn’t want to pollute my nice account 😂

Hehe...all good, I got the gist! Oh, wow, so you're already looked into the feasibility of it? I think for a few this may indeed be a possibility then, which would be unfortunate if true. Good thinking on not polluting your account, as it probably wouldn't go so well...lol! 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

Yeah, let’s say that the content of some in both posting and replying is sometimes “triggering”. And that caught my eye, combined with some accounts that are using some kind of script for aut-replying as well. But just that, not intelligently, just some always the same standard reply.
So combining the two ideas, my developer brain started thinking (at night, of course), the day after, a testable was quickly set up.

I think that this is a rather important potential issue, especially for those in the top ten, who are getting rewarded for their engagement. I want to tag @melinda010100, so that she's aware of this possibility. Can it be tested with an account set up for that purpose? 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

We could, yes…
Definitely

Good. OK, then if @melinda010100 doesn't respond here, I'll message her in Discord. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

Sounds like a plan indeed! ;-)
!DOOK