I'd like to weigh in here. I am involved in the B of Joy, to be more specifically I spoke to "May B", the person she is referring to.
Let me discuss several points brought by you:
"After that we talked about conspiracy theories for around an hour. I got on board quickly and started working on a video for the foundation."
We did not talk an hour about conspiracy theories. We talked about the B of Joy, the financial system, the problems, the effects for our future, our children, the atrocities against our children and yes of course we spoke about the people/group(s) of people who are doing this. This is not conspiracy theory. This is simple facts, except for the latter which is hypothesizing based on the little true information there is.
"I had watched the original dutch video. But when I saw the video getting translated into so many languages soon after the release and how many english speaking youtube channels were sharing this content I got suspicious about it."
Why did you get suspicious about it? You don't explain why. There are numerous whistleblower videos who went virally. Going after Ronald in particular is strange.
"Ronald Bernard and his so called first life
Bernard claims he worked as an entrepreneur in what he calls his first life. I never called it that but I am living something like a second life as well so I have some kind of idea what someone means who says so. I have been working as a journalist and if I would give you my real name you could check it out and find evidence to this claim. Just because I found out some terrible facts about msm and "ended" my life as their supporter, there is no way to delete my first life from the internet. You could find out easily. However, when you search the internet for Bernards name before 2013, you won't find anything. He says he had his own fashion line. Seems like this was some kind of secret brand because Bernard has never been to any fashion exposition or show, he never registered a fashion company under his name and his name is in no way connected to any kind of fashion label whatsoever. Same thing goes for selling cars, in&export and his work in the textile field."
In the third inverview he mentioned that his financial career was from '82 till '94. So meaning before '82 he was in the textile and so forth. The internet did not exist then mainstream. So that is not possible. Why people are hammering on this, I don't know.
"He called himself one of the big players. But there has never been any mention anywhere. I can't find any registered firm to his name. Like I said before I have been working as a journalist but I never failed so hard in finding out anything about a person. Either he wasn't as successful as he claims or he just lies."
I don't understand this logic. The more towards the top, the less information we have on the entities. What do we really know about the BIS etc.. not much. What do we really know about the bloodlines that are said to define our reality? Nothing...
"You can ask me anything"
I wrote a mail to my supervisor about my concerns. It took him over two weeks to answer my questions get back to me. He told me that this video would answer all of my questions."
I was on vacation, hence I could not reply faster than I did.
"– First he says, he has no CV because he was an entrepreneur. Maybe he never needed one but he could just produce one. It's not very hard to write down one's jobs."
Why? I was entrepreneur myself and noway I am going to pen down everything I did. I don't understand. He also mentioned in the interview, before he went into the financial system, he was not a very nice guy, hence he got the seat on the stock exchange.
"– next he asks how bad we want him to paint himself as a mad man. Where is this idea coming from? We know he did bad things. He told us so. But WHAT did he do?"
The sensationalist mind. Everyone is asking this. This is pure sensation, people want to be triggered by more and more extreme stuff.
"Next problem: We know there are ways to oppress informations. I think that's what we know best, right?! It is always suspicious when someone gets that popular. The search term "Ronald Bernard" on youtube spits out almost 15,000 hits. This happened in the last 5 months …"
Why is it a problem? Because our minds are so controlled that we believe that the powers that be are so powerful that nobody can truly come clean, or truly be honest? As I have mentioned elsewhere, we are part of the problem, we give "them" so much power, we render ourselves useless, which of course is what they want.
"Smash 240. This channel doesn't exist anymore and I can't find anything else about smash240. As if he would have only existed for this purpose. Every reference I find online is just about him sharing the video with Ronald Bernard."
So here again, the mind makes it owns conclusions because it cannot stand uncertainty. We have nothing to do with smash240. If it is a way to make it appear like that, fine. It won't be the first and last trick what is pulled.
"One of the most famous first multiplicators was Robert David Steel's Public Intelligence Blog. Mind the odd wording. Steel is former (?) CIA and definitely disinfo. He works with people like Alex Jones and George Webb. Robert David Steele can't be trusted and the first one who shared the info can't be trusted either. "
See above, again, our mind is lineair and dualistic. We can't escape the notion that people can change. The human spirit within each one of us is awakening. Can it undo past actions? NO. But it can change future actions. This also counts for your allegation of being a fraud because there is a person of the Maltan order in the B of Joy. Changing behavior and consciousness is not exclusively to the people that are not part of any order. The alternative media is part accountable for this negative thinking, and giving "them" way too much power, that they are so majestically and perfect in conning society.
"Ronald Bernard wasn't asked to name names. He was asked to give ANY references about his work. It's possible to do that without harming anyone. "
That is not his view and experience. Why are people telling him to do what he has to do? He won't.
Why are we not focussing on changing the financial system through tooling that the B of Joy offers? No, we show self destructive behavior by destroying the few things that are good. Based on assumptions, insecurity of the brain and instilled patterns of behavior. Ronald offered many years of his free time to create holistic solutions for a better alternative. I bet that that are more real efforts than anyone of us (including me) here combined have done to change this world.
We are not focussing on what should happen by attacking Ronald Bernard, i.e. a different financial system, as all depends on it. Fix the financial system and we'll see that wars will end, hunger will end and what more. Research it.
Also research what the B of Joy offers in terms of solutions. Research in relation to current economic and financial mechanisms, and you'll see this is a good alternative. That is what matters. It is not called the Ronald Bernard Bank. It's a foundation and citizen-led, meaning that more people are behind the B of Joy to launch these solutions, he's not earning money with it, nothing. To be repetitive, that is a much bigger investment in a better future than many of us. We could also applaud that.... ?
Kind regards
I think you should read part 2. And I beg you to keep your comments a bit shorter. https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@mayb/more-curiosities-about-whistleblower-ronald-bernard-and-the-bank-he-is-founding
gcuccureddu Thank you for your decent and reply to this rather silly woman. Unlike her reasoning, your reply is intelligent. Maybe she is very young still?