I know that Churchill liked Jinnah & called Gandhi a "native fakir". He was forced out of power because the electorate perceived that he lost the Empire. Even so, as an Indian, I'm glad that he contributed to delivering us from the "superior Aryans".
Churchill is not pure "white" but, he was not blacker than "black", as you postulate.
He was voted back in by the British because of a new set of enemies: the Soviets.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I understand your points, but he also caused the deaths of countless millions (the empire were excellent at destroying records) of Indians in the Bengal region, prepartition era.
He was despised by most of parliament for his loutish behaviour, and would have never made it to Prime Minister, except that no one else wanted the job. He was the wrong man in the right place.
I never postulated that he is blacker than black. I believe he was just like Hitler, a human who thought he was doing right, but being a white-supremacist, a good guy for his in-group, and a bad guy for the out-group.
He acquiesced to the Bengal famine, as the Independent reports,Yes, @riskdebonair
You're to kind towards Winston,he screwed anything othe r than british interest,introducing tito in yugoslav history,emprisonning our king in the savoy in london .he got a clap on his face during a transit in belgrade before the war and did not react,just saying sorry for you are a poor people on a wrong place.