Witnesses have expenses (such as servers, etc.) that need to be paid. No need to create FUD, but the author of said post is a nut-case herself, so nothing new there.
Yep, I noticed he's not a very popular author. But nonetheless, I've also found pretty coherent arguments within his tirades not so easy to refute. That's why I've used the link toward his post like a relevant remark to ponder further & better about that 'retaining stakeholders' pointing mark in your post. };)
Witnesses have expenses (such as servers, etc.) that need to be paid. No need to create FUD, but the author of said post is a nut-case herself, so nothing new there.
Yep, I noticed he's not a very popular author. But nonetheless, I've also found pretty coherent arguments within his tirades not so easy to refute. That's why I've used the link toward his post like a relevant remark to ponder further & better about that 'retaining stakeholders' pointing mark in your post. };)
Witnesses and stakeholders have made all the decisions that have placed us here.
So, they should take the paycut they've earned.