Bernie had a good point though, I know you do a lot, but there are so many witnesses that don't do anything, some that haven't even posted/voted in a week.
I think maybe making people review their votes every quarter would be a good idea.
Bernie had a good point though, I know you do a lot, but there are so many witnesses that don't do anything, some that haven't even posted/voted in a week.
I think maybe making people review their votes every quarter would be a good idea.
Yes, of course, reviewing witness votes is in each user best interest.
I disagree however that posting/voting is anything that distinguish good witnesses from bad witnesses. Tust me, I'm actually much more useful to the platform when I'm not posting :-)
But on the other hand I get the need of keeping touch with reality, and thus with community as a part of what is expected from witnesses on the social platform.
Main witness role is to produce blocks reliably. They really don't need to do more. The other question is whether those witnesses that don't do more than minimum should be voted higher than those who do.
But that's not the question for the witnesses.
That's the question that each user should ask himself.