50% curation is an opportunity for both investors and good content creators. Greater rewards for making an effort to curate sounds fair and reasonably easy to explain. Content creators may get a smaller piece of the pie but it'll be a bigger pie as more accounts are actively curating.
In regards to these changes not being called for, I strongly disagree. There have been many posts calling for 50% curation rewards for a long time. I wrote a post about it three months ago.
I can see the possible complications you might face as a bot owner. Demand for your services could fall. Rewards to delegators would need tweaking. You're an innovator I'm sure you'll be fine.
Interesting points, @spectrumecons
Ouch, mean - Of Course, these changes will not affect me in any other way than a larger part of the bots will generate SteemPower instead of liquid rewards, so for me, this is a royal jackpot.
That is also why I questioning its motive because if I had proposed it, I think you all would have been against it calling me too greedy or something.
Now you are speaking a language I understand. That should be the start of the OP, @kevinwong you have some learning to do from @spectrumecons, he is really good at writing 3 lines that make more sense than your entire post did, respectfully, no pun intended.
That being said, we still have things to debate, and @smooth, do not forget to include me in this haven of yours.
Thanks.
I do not have any sort of 'haven'. I mean I do own a private Slack that I used to use to chat privately with a few other Steem investors but it hasn't been used in a year or more. If you are looking for more venues to communicate, you will need to search elsewhere.
Well, ok. I wish you had one.
With so much onboarding, proposals/disputes, roadmap/HF21, SMTs and a bunch of other things going on, expecting everyone to read everyone's post on the steem blockchain is asking a bit much. Maybe one can be created and brought into good use for the purpose of gathering/sum up and talk about cases in a more organized form.
I think that is what this post was trying to do.
Sure. That may be, I would like to meet on a teamspeak/mumble/discord/VOIP conference in the future. Once a month, 60 minutes, do you think the top community could manage to arange something like that?
I have no idea. Try it and see. Personally I don't do audio.