If you can't comment to ask questions about witnessing how on earth are you supposed to figure out who to vote for? It's not like there's an easy-to-find resource where the witnesses tell you why they're good at witnessing. Most don't bother doing that anywhere. When Curie clunked out it became clear that a lot of us were voting for Curie because they're Curie and we wanted them to get the rewards, not because we had any idea what their witness process was. And they're hardly alone. It sounds like the witnesses themselves might have a lot more information on how each other operate, but it's not readily available to regular users, much less brand new ones.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: