I've seen your comments where you defended him, said he was good for Steemit. Why are trying to downvote my comment away? If you are advertising for why people should vote for you for witness, why can't anyone counter that? You made lots of money off the person who is pretty much the face of rewards pool rape, and then defended him. What part of that is not true?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
He's an investor and wanting to buy into Steem (STEEM (!) - NOT STEEMIT). That's why he is good for Steem. But I was always clear about the fact that I didn't support his way of promoting and only defended him as a human being, so he is not being bullied off the platform.
You want a higher Steem price? Then you need investors in Steem.
And I can downvote whatever I want. Especially if the comment is based on wrong facts.
Do you know how much time I'm investing in Steem?
It's 4am and I'm still awake, waiting for my witness nodes to be ready so I can active my witness again to secure the blockchain, after dedicating the whole day to make sure I'm ready once a fix for the bug has been released.
You think this is easy?
Do you even know what makes a good witness? You would if you'd have read the post.
But you're focusing on irrelevant details, based on wrong facts.
You don't like me? Fine.
You don't want to vote me? Cool.
But don't expect that I'll allow you taking a shit on me under my own post, that I've spent hours on writing.
How about you add a 6th image of your weed to your next post.