This is a very reasonable and valid position, but are you not afraid of the decision that could be made by the account owner, which in fact is different, and maybe don't want to respect the social contract made by Ned about those accounts?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Yes, it is a very real concern. I would like to see them voluntarily agree to make updates to restrict the use of their stake in a way the Steem community and stakeholders are comfortable with. I outlined in my post the alternative if we are not able to achieve a mutually beneficial agreement.