Think it is good to hold the top 20 accountable for their role in rolling out this HF as well. I think the HF should have been rolled back 6 to 8 hours in. We are still now at only about 15% of the normal transacting user count, so even now a roll back might be still worth considering. I personaly just removed my votes for top twenty witnesses @curie, @blocktrades and @utopian-io and voted for the whole 21-40 bunch. I think the top 20 should really step up their game and convince the comunity (with statements like yours) this HF has been a major learning experience for them that they dedicate themselves to should not get a repeat, or make room for the 21-40 witnesses and let them proof the next HF won't have to turn out as dramatic as this.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I am holding them accountable. Which is why I am saying that there needs to be public statements from all of them and they need to set their foot down if things don't work.
Rolling back a hard fork after some time would be a problem in itself. That would need a lot of preparation in advance, otherwise you have to delete all the blocks after the HF block and we come into muddy territory.
I hope that we can implement a process where a rollback is not needed but an option in case of problems.