It's a wishy-washy position you maintain, either you condone it, or you don't, and in this post it's hard to say you're not blaming bid bot use, where as in the other post you clearly don't have a problem with it, exactly like you've expressed above, "I don't blame people". Tell me, why don't you blame people for undermining the platform? What good is all this profit maximization when you're stance is on gift economy?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I do think I contradict myself constantly on Steemit, because I'm usually brainstorming out loud. To be honest, after all these months—I still feel like I only understand a tiny fraction of the dynamics of how Steemit works (especially when you consider the psychological aspect, which continually baffles me.) If you don't mind continuing the conversation tomorrow when I'm more well-rested, I'd be happy to :-) In the meantime, give me some food for thought from your perspective if you like because I'm curious what you think about it.
I suspect you’re dead on. The masses often ruin their own caves by polluting it. I think that has happened.
Posted using Partiko iOS
We can’t really expect human nature to change?
Posted using Partiko iOS
I agree people are sitting on their hands but I also agree most people are good!
I think the problem extends from the ability to generate income from the bidbots and not necessarily from the people using the services. Simple solution is promotion should not be allowed with a gamble of generating an income but then I ask how do we police this situation? I have seen Mrs. Sanders and others make an attempt but without being able to generate an ROI there is no whale support making it a very uneven playing field.
Posted using Partiko iOS