There are many issues with steemit and the structure and transparency. It is quite clear what these issues are: excessive, unwarranted leverage, intravoting between the whales, retention of SP etc. However, to smear a person's name with no justification is not really very honourable. I vote for witnesses and I have been fairly assiduous about it. I even put at the bottom of my posts who I vote for and why.
I think it only fair that if you level a criticism against someone who is an important member of steemit that you should justify these claims such that they can respond. Clearly explained criticisms (with examples) can then be met with clearly explained rebuttal and/or explanation.
I hope this observation is a fair commentary.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from: