Hextech downvoted me for questioning the efficiency of the vaccine more than once. They are not free speech. Especially rishi who is probably a sociopath if I had to guess from he responded to my questioning of the downvote.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I'm sure observers here would like to look at that, do you have any links? Thanks
https://www.peakd.com/@phusionphil/boycott-the-witness-who-is-against-questioning-the-vaccine
Thanks, I will take a look.
Lol they even downvotes this comment. Make sure you look at the comments before they were edited too, these whales like to redact their statements sometimes and the original comment speaks to a different truth than the edited one.
Thanks, noted. I've removed my vote for their witness, will edit my comment above, and will include them on the do not support side of my upcoming witnesses post.
I wonder if there is even 1 person in the top 30 witnesses who has any experience with PR.
Not that I am aware of, though maybe.
well someone i invited to hive is a english teacher and comedian, he is very confused about the ethics and considering not even using this platform due to the way this top 30 group acts.
its making me look stupid and like I am as low of a human being as the top 30 witnesses to stay on this platform, i have to constantly defend free speech and sovereignty of wealth, when i could just use Blurt instead with no downvotes which would mediate 100% of the drama we see here.
I'm just observing the downvotes on this comment which seem to confirm what you are saying.
Yeah. Those folks downvoting in comment sections sure play dirty, eh.
Lol, I have noticed that a lot of the downvote complainers are quite promiscuous downvoters themselves. But its ok, if they're doing it... :OD
I downvote because it's the only way I have been able to get people to start having a discussion about the flaws of DPOS.
Until they are loosing money they don't seem to care about anything.
I especially liked the part near the beginning of Hive and for several months, any artist, photographer, personality, entertainer, and the like, got downvoted heavily just for doing a good job and making the place fun, while this crowd sat on their hands saying nothing, ignoring it, turning a blind eye to it, and sometimes even mocking those on the receiving end claiming they deserved it, most likely because the one downvoting would often upvote their political drivel. Funny how that works...
Funny how I only started downvoting on a regular basis after I was zeroed for weeks on end.
Yeah they are psychic leeches, the type you find on the bottom of your boot after a revolution.
God... damn it!
Dissention in the ranks!
I'm happy to adjust my statement (again) and go back to supporting your witness if this is addressed.
I don't know your two partners at all, but I've always appreciated your content, comments, and presence on the chain.
Rishi goes on a self-righteous rampage once and a while.
Kid needs to chill out.
Luckily most devs (including my devs) are quite poor and I mostly get to run the show.
Can we buyout rishis interest in this witness? (to remove the bad actor)
Technically likely but logistically no.
If that makes sense.
Rishi does most of the work :D
Or at least did quite a bit.
Don't worry about it though I have big plans.
I don't think @hextech's 14k stake is too big of a problem at this point.
A vote from me is what? x10 that?
Perhaps I could work more on my database to track these things.
I have always enjoyed you debates and blogs so please do let me know, i will buy out toxic actors because im not a poor piece of shit that needs money from hive.
If you buy them out... what's to stop them from buying back in to resume their actions on the blockchain?
I think the intent is good... But we need to rethink the fundamentals of the blockchain so as to strip away individual centric egos/subjective opinions/outright abuse (even)/ etc. with the use of the DV.
This is and always should have been something maintained by the collective DPOS community. Outsourcing Hive integrity to the individual is a sure recipe for disaster.
DPOS has it's holes... but we can still innovate new and better solutions for controlling abuse (like spam, plagiarism, hate, threats, violence, child pornography, etc.) and doing so in a way that doesn't trade one abuse for another.
What we are (potentially) dealing with would be considered MASIVE things for any individual to deal with.
Flagging individually makes sense... but in order to deal with (and send a clear message to those content instigators) we really do need to innovate away from the RAW DOWNVOTE and towards a process/multi-step Flag AND Downvote.
In it's current state it's undeveloped, inadequate, and the cause of a lot of harmful social interaction that might not have been played out had we seen things for what they really are.
This is an opportunity for positive action...
I think so anyways...
We have to take the attention away from "This individual did that!" or "That individual did this!" and fix social at the code level.
Steering the blockchain towards more positive social outcomes will bring us all UPwards... all of this infighting will not.
We all need to continue innovating new and better ways to human... THAT is the opportunity and blockchain and the social surrounding it is the means.
We are empowered for positive change but only if we truly want it.