I don't wonder why at all. I'm attempting to make some arguments that you're not happy to hear. Rather than refute what I've said, you mute me, and try to ignore what I'm saying while at the same time implying that what we've said privately is somehow damning. I'm happy to make our conversation public to avoid that implication.
As riveting as this 'conversation' is, it's 2:40am. If you have anything of substance, please share, or don't - I don't care either way to be honest. Either way I will get to it tomorrow. Wasted quite enough of my day on this nonsense with you lot.
What about the substantive argument I've already presented, in response to which you muted me? Will you be getting around to responding to that tomorrow? If so, that sounds great!
I don't recall making an argument that you stole Jimmie's voiceover work. He is simply now requesting you no longer use it to promote your venture. Is that unreasonable? And Rhonda's now accusing me of being drunk. Keeping it classy, I see. When one of you is willing to rationally refute the argument I presented here and privately with you Gmuxx, I'll be glad to listen. If instead, you wish to impugn my character with ad hominem and labeling me an alcoholic... that speaks for itself.
I don't wonder why at all. I'm attempting to make some arguments that you're not happy to hear. Rather than refute what I've said, you mute me, and try to ignore what I'm saying while at the same time implying that what we've said privately is somehow damning. I'm happy to make our conversation public to avoid that implication.
As riveting as this 'conversation' is, it's 2:40am. If you have anything of substance, please share, or don't - I don't care either way to be honest. Either way I will get to it tomorrow. Wasted quite enough of my day on this nonsense with you lot.
What about the substantive argument I've already presented, in response to which you muted me? Will you be getting around to responding to that tomorrow? If so, that sounds great!
You mean the argument that we somehow stole an image and some voiceover work that was freely given? No, I won't be answering that one.
She's in the Boodles again. She won't be able to have a conversation anyone can follow until she sleeps it off. LOL
I don't recall making an argument that you stole Jimmie's voiceover work. He is simply now requesting you no longer use it to promote your venture. Is that unreasonable? And Rhonda's now accusing me of being drunk. Keeping it classy, I see. When one of you is willing to rationally refute the argument I presented here and privately with you Gmuxx, I'll be glad to listen. If instead, you wish to impugn my character with ad hominem and labeling me an alcoholic... that speaks for itself.