They are not plagiarized, which is not the same as an original work. If you read this post where you commented on (THIS POST), you would probably understand it.
Sorry, but I don't think that's a fair analysis. The four articles I've written during the last seven days include a personal travel article, an episode from an original screenplay which I wrote, a personal essay, and a film review of two series I watched, researched, and wrote about. Saying my work is not original is a pretty bold criticism. If you can explain how it doesn't hold up to the principles you've put forth in this article, then please do. If not, then please don't insult my work.
I haven't insulted your work.
In my article here I give a specific idea about what I find original. You don't need to agree with it. But then to comment on my post (without upvoting it, or engaging with it, but just wanting to attract readers to your own blog) that you claim 100% originality... it goes too far. Especially as it does not conform to idea of originality in the plea I put forward in this very post.
I have said nothing about your content, or about the quality of your content. I have confirmed it is 100% written by you. I have also alluded to the fact that this, in my opinion, does not constitute originality.
It's a bit silly to "wish me the best" after you've smeared my blog. And you still haven't explained how my writing doesn't meet your idea of originality. Did you even read any of my articles? Or do you reserve your good opinions based on whether someone upvotes you or not?
They are not plagiarized, which is not the same as an original work. If you read this post where you commented on (THIS POST), you would probably understand it.
Sorry, but I don't think that's a fair analysis. The four articles I've written during the last seven days include a personal travel article, an episode from an original screenplay which I wrote, a personal essay, and a film review of two series I watched, researched, and wrote about. Saying my work is not original is a pretty bold criticism. If you can explain how it doesn't hold up to the principles you've put forth in this article, then please do. If not, then please don't insult my work.
I haven't insulted your work.
In my article here I give a specific idea about what I find original. You don't need to agree with it. But then to comment on my post (without upvoting it, or engaging with it, but just wanting to attract readers to your own blog) that you claim 100% originality... it goes too far. Especially as it does not conform to idea of originality in the plea I put forward in this very post.
I have said nothing about your content, or about the quality of your content. I have confirmed it is 100% written by you. I have also alluded to the fact that this, in my opinion, does not constitute originality.
I wish you all the best.
It's a bit silly to "wish me the best" after you've smeared my blog. And you still haven't explained how my writing doesn't meet your idea of originality. Did you even read any of my articles? Or do you reserve your good opinions based on whether someone upvotes you or not?