You've already implied I'm right about "the other cases".
No. I merely stated that each case has to be looked upon as single event. You can't say this one case is abuse just because there were (if they were) other cases of abuse before.
And in this case I don't see anything that shouts abuse.
Can you admit that you're in the wrong here, or are you one of those people who never does?
I admit I am wrong if you can proof it. Not when you just make it up.
I'm allowed to be rude because you're writing incorrect things.
This is your argument? Really? This is really the argument you want to make? Doesn't even deserve a response.
Where did I say that to you?