You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Steem is not YouTube. Violating the Terms will not get your Content Removed

in #youtube7 years ago

I have not found this to be true.

• A filtered Google Image search will indicate whether an image is licensed or not. Google calls it usage rights.
• USP: unique selling propisition
• On Facebook:

So, although you may be able to withdraw your consent to the use of photos on Facebook, you should also keep in mind that if you share your photos and videos with Facebook applications, those applications may have their own terms and conditions of how they use your creation!
Who Owns Photos and Videos Posted on Facebook, Instagram or Twitter?

Sort:  

the unique selling position should be obvious.

For Steemians, we love other Steemians and Steemian products and services.

With my proposed stock image site, I would enable Steem photogs to make Steem currency directly. For the Steemian blogger, there is an innate trust of other Steemians who produce artwork. And as a Steemian project, my site would have significant advantage over any stock photo site. Furthermore, the "cheetah" style bot will be pointing people to my site.

In other words.... it will be sufficiently unique to acquire new users daily.

And as for Facebook licensing, I am not interested in your diversion.

Here's why: It's irrelevant

Facebook is not where real professional photographers post their work. That is plain and simple. Facebook is full of junk, and no one is interested in licensing junk for their blog anyway. There may be a news story periodically, but the bloggers needing those images can usually get by with fair use of those kinds of images.

So who cares about the Facebook TOS?

Not the billion users who post photos on it every day. And certainly not me.

All the very best with your project, @uruiamme
Your expertise on this issue is vastly superior to mine, sir.

I am not interested in your diversion.

Yet, there was a question posed to me on images in one of my posts. 😊