Thanks for the response @abusereports - so please, could you explain what constitutes as junk? (Note I am actually being civil and trying to have a constructive discussion, not complaining or anything like that. However at the same time, guidelines are necessary).
For example - word length, improper categorisation of flags, spamming many posts, phishing, etc. There needs to be objective guidelines on what constitutes as junk. Especially, a daily flag report needs a link to that guideline, otherwise new users will always ask the same question. :-)
So please, no need to remove the down-vote, but in a civil way, can you explain to me, what objective method you used to classify it?
For me, was it about travel? - Yes
Did it describe a travel experience? - Yes
Did it give recommendations of things to do? - Yes
Are there favourable comments on it by other users? - Yes
Plus it was packaged into a story. So please, since we're all trying to make steem better, let us hear your point of view as well!
Anyway, no hard feelings @abusereports - Keep up the good work. If steem didn't have police like yourself and @grumpycat, it wouldn't be as cool. Keep up the good work!
OK @abusereports - As a stake holder, what are your subjective reasons, then? If you just didn't like it it...OK, let's go on with our lives, but keeping a community clean is all about community and discussion. The flag is about cleaning up abusive posts or spam
I will unflag this post if @abusereports credibly explains their reasoning. Keeping the community clean is important but so is laying guidelines and using clear, non-subjective rules.
@estabond: I have sent you 1.1 SBD today (worth 2.6 USD), which was a little less than 25% of the bidding round - you sent an up vote of 4.27% to the post I wanted to promote, worth roughly 0.63 USD. Besides the fact that this was not correct - you seem to have included a transfer of 10 USD which came after the end of the bidding round - this is not in line with the -10% ROI promise you make. Please review this asap.
Ridiculous rewards on junk. That's why.
Thanks for the response @abusereports - so please, could you explain what constitutes as junk? (Note I am actually being civil and trying to have a constructive discussion, not complaining or anything like that. However at the same time, guidelines are necessary).
For example - word length, improper categorisation of flags, spamming many posts, phishing, etc. There needs to be objective guidelines on what constitutes as junk. Especially, a daily flag report needs a link to that guideline, otherwise new users will always ask the same question. :-)
So please, no need to remove the down-vote, but in a civil way, can you explain to me, what objective method you used to classify it?
For me, was it about travel? - Yes
Did it describe a travel experience? - Yes
Did it give recommendations of things to do? - Yes
Are there favourable comments on it by other users? - Yes
Plus it was packaged into a story. So please, since we're all trying to make steem better, let us hear your point of view as well!
There do NOT need to be any objective guidelines, that's why we're all able to vote as we wish with our stake.
Anyway, no hard feelings @abusereports - Keep up the good work. If steem didn't have police like yourself and @grumpycat, it wouldn't be as cool. Keep up the good work!
OK @abusereports - As a stake holder, what are your subjective reasons, then? If you just didn't like it it...OK, let's go on with our lives, but keeping a community clean is all about community and discussion. The flag is about cleaning up abusive posts or spam
Note I'm actually opening a discussion.
I will unflag this post if @abusereports credibly explains their reasoning. Keeping the community clean is important but so is laying guidelines and using clear, non-subjective rules.
hey @estabond what is your problem i will be send 0.1 sbd you only 0.10$ upvote
This comment has received a 0.42 % upvote from @speedvoter thanks to: @sorayakhatun.
Transfer 1.000 SBD to estabond https://steemit.com/dlive/@legko/275d6940-51af-11e8-9a24-d742e7d65001 and I got 0.34 apvot. how is this possible?
has not been voted on post its my life
hay @estabond refund my o.200 sbd please
Hey @estabond can you please check my bid (1 SBD, 23/04/2018 at 18:49 for https://steemit.com/pt/@psos/take), you didn't upvote or refund. Thanks!
give me back the 6 SBD your bot just ate please. not cool, I reward people on here out of my own pocket, getting ripped off doesn't make it easier.
I've just sent 0.5 SBD & it isn't either on bot bids or refunded.
@estabond you are cheating. I transferred you 0.1 sbd for promoting my post and you didn't upvoted me.
hi @estabond,
I sent you 0.5 SBD for my post, but i didn't get any vote from you. please solve it.
7 hours ago 0.5 SBD sent to @estabond https://steemit.com/blockchain/@mefio/czy-rodo-w-jakims-stopniu-ograniczy-blockchain
Are you serious? I sent you 0.5 SBD and you upvote me only 0.12$! That was the last time i gave you any SBD
This asshat stole .54 sbd from me...!!! ??? Lesson learned...
Hi @hitwill. I sent you 4.500 SBD for my post. But you already voted for it earlier https://busy.org/@cryptonewslife/paysage-787 please return my sbd or correct to this post rate https://steemit.com/photography/@cryptonewslife/paysage-790
.png)
@estabond: I have sent you 1.1 SBD today (worth 2.6 USD), which was a little less than 25% of the bidding round - you sent an up vote of 4.27% to the post I wanted to promote, worth roughly 0.63 USD. Besides the fact that this was not correct - you seem to have included a transfer of 10 USD which came after the end of the bidding round - this is not in line with the -10% ROI promise you make. Please review this asap.