After reading all the comments, a few things jump out at me.
- @stellabelle knows how to generate strong feelings on both sides of the scale.
- @mibenkito missed an excellent opportunity for future earnings by being defensive .
If I am not sure about a post or if something doesn't resonate with me, I will not read it, usually. One of the first things I look for when a post interests me is the background on the poster. I like to know a little about the person. If an introductory post is not available, I usually don't frequent his/her writings in the future.
If @mibenkito would open up, use this opportunity to let a little of her life out, she would benefit financially, if not spiritually.
Sorry, I am here because I want to share my passion, I am not here to sell my identity :)
There are technical methods to allow for privacy (access control) with verification. You don't have to verify yourself to everyone on Facebook or Twitter, you just have to verify yourself to Twitter. You shouldn't have to verify yourself to me directly, but instead you do it once and your account is verified. All of this can be done on the blockchain, and AI itself could look at your government ID so the whole process is automated with the minimum amount of human beings accessing your personal information.
Some humans are nosey and want more access to personal information than they need to verify you. Technically at most only one human being needs to verify you and honestly, these processes are stream lined. Know your customer for example requires this process. Facebook for example asked me for my government ID before because someone reported that I was AI, and once they saw my Id they unlocked my account. In my opinion, it is not necessary for me to break your pseudo-anonymity in order for the blockchain to verify you as human.
Reference